Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39801 - 39810 of 69114 for he.
Search results 39801 - 39810 of 69114 for he.
Oak Hill Development Corporation v. Board of Review for the City of Oak Creek
that from 1991 to 1995 he did not change the assessment value of $4,000 per acre. Oak Hills’ representative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12671 - 2005-03-31
that from 1991 to 1995 he did not change the assessment value of $4,000 per acre. Oak Hills’ representative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12671 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of Sharon’s current appeal. ¶4 At the hearing, Dr. Jeffrey Marcus testified that he is a board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033397 - 2025-11-04
of Sharon’s current appeal. ¶4 At the hearing, Dr. Jeffrey Marcus testified that he is a board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033397 - 2025-11-04
State v. Michael C. Curran
eyes were bloodshot and glassy, that his speech was slightly thick-tongued, and that he had an odor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11045 - 2005-03-31
eyes were bloodshot and glassy, that his speech was slightly thick-tongued, and that he had an odor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11045 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
but was released when E.T. refused to confirm he was the perpetrator. On January 4, 2022, the Division received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1058668 - 2026-01-06
but was released when E.T. refused to confirm he was the perpetrator. On January 4, 2022, the Division received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1058668 - 2026-01-06
COURT OF APPEALS
the homicide conviction; specifically, he claims that the testimony of the prosecution’s lead witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33536 - 2008-07-29
the homicide conviction; specifically, he claims that the testimony of the prosecution’s lead witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33536 - 2008-07-29
State v. Leon Taylor
that he did not assert his right to a speedy trial before the first trial. As to the prejudice factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7927 - 2005-03-31
that he did not assert his right to a speedy trial before the first trial. As to the prejudice factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7927 - 2005-03-31
Patti Jo Hendricks v. Gregory A. Thieme
that as a pro se litigant he had insufficient time for preparation. The trial court denied the motion by letter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21213 - 2006-02-06
that as a pro se litigant he had insufficient time for preparation. The trial court denied the motion by letter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21213 - 2006-02-06
Frontsheet
by the referee. ¶3 Attorney Woods has been licensed to practice law in Wisconsin since 1965. He has been
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33321 - 2008-07-07
by the referee. ¶3 Attorney Woods has been licensed to practice law in Wisconsin since 1965. He has been
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33321 - 2008-07-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of both offenses. In July 2003, he was sentenced to twenty-six years and three months of imprisonment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239897 - 2019-04-25
of both offenses. In July 2003, he was sentenced to twenty-six years and three months of imprisonment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239897 - 2019-04-25
James R. Grassman v. Deanna L. Grassman
maintenance payments to his ex-wife, Deanna. He argues that the court should have terminated his maintenance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16143 - 2005-03-31
maintenance payments to his ex-wife, Deanna. He argues that the court should have terminated his maintenance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16143 - 2005-03-31