Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39801 - 39810 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 39801 - 39810 of 58506 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-Jimenez was convicted of first-degree intentional homicide following a jury trial, and sentenced to life
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=646776 - 2023-04-20
-Jimenez was convicted of first-degree intentional homicide following a jury trial, and sentenced to life
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=646776 - 2023-04-20
State v. Theresa M. Sobacki
Protection Cause. The trial court decided that § 346.61 does not violate the Equal Protection Clause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16025 - 2005-03-31
Protection Cause. The trial court decided that § 346.61 does not violate the Equal Protection Clause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16025 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
hearing. At that time, trial counsel could not provide credit information due to uncertainty about
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=421269 - 2021-09-08
hearing. At that time, trial counsel could not provide credit information due to uncertainty about
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=421269 - 2021-09-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
phase of the proceedings and, after a trial, the court found that he failed to prove his defense
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=548133 - 2022-07-27
phase of the proceedings and, after a trial, the court found that he failed to prove his defense
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=548133 - 2022-07-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is made, the trial judge should inquire whether there are proper reasons for substitution.” Id., ¶66
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248157 - 2019-10-08
is made, the trial judge should inquire whether there are proper reasons for substitution.” Id., ¶66
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248157 - 2019-10-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
further challenges the trial court’s decision to rescind an order for an interpreter during the pendency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82287 - 2014-09-15
further challenges the trial court’s decision to rescind an order for an interpreter during the pendency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82287 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
relating to the plea agreement, and he faults his trial attorney and the trial court for failing to explain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34196 - 2008-10-01
relating to the plea agreement, and he faults his trial attorney and the trial court for failing to explain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34196 - 2008-10-01
Edward Humpel v. Donald R. Meider
to determine the grantor's intent. They also contend that the trial court erroneously interpreted the document
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10175 - 2005-03-31
to determine the grantor's intent. They also contend that the trial court erroneously interpreted the document
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10175 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
trial court record entries” and “the findings or opinion of the trial court.” Id. The appendix
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29106 - 2007-05-22
trial court record entries” and “the findings or opinion of the trial court.” Id. The appendix
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29106 - 2007-05-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not violated and that the trial court properly exercised its discretion in not granting him an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252390 - 2020-01-15
not violated and that the trial court properly exercised its discretion in not granting him an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252390 - 2020-01-15