Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39811 - 39820 of 59067 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 39811 - 39820 of 59067 for SMALL CLAIMS.
State v. James D. Krause
. The motion indicated that it was brought under Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (1999-2000).[1] Krause claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3196 - 2005-03-31
. The motion indicated that it was brought under Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (1999-2000).[1] Krause claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3196 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
summary judgment to Robert and Ann Konneker on the Konnekers’ claim that they have the right to build
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35921 - 2009-03-18
summary judgment to Robert and Ann Konneker on the Konnekers’ claim that they have the right to build
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35921 - 2009-03-18
[PDF]
Joyce Judith Syphard v. Ronald James Syphard
therefore fails, because it depends on the truth of his claim to no actual notice of the trial. As noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5243 - 2017-09-19
therefore fails, because it depends on the truth of his claim to no actual notice of the trial. As noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5243 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Milwaukee Insurance Company v. Randy Krueger
PER CURIAM. Milwaukee Insurance Company appeals a summary judgment dismissing its subrogation claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11820 - 2017-09-21
PER CURIAM. Milwaukee Insurance Company appeals a summary judgment dismissing its subrogation claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11820 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
] and would have insisted on going to trial.” Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59 (1985). Backman claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210424 - 2018-04-03
] and would have insisted on going to trial.” Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59 (1985). Backman claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210424 - 2018-04-03
[PDF]
State v. Shirley A. Kolve
of a defense to the charge. We reject these claims and affirm the judgment of conviction. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2919 - 2017-09-19
of a defense to the charge. We reject these claims and affirm the judgment of conviction. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2919 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in default for failure to appear except that pleadings asserting new or additional claims for relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145095 - 2017-09-21
in default for failure to appear except that pleadings asserting new or additional claims for relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145095 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
indicated it did not make a difference. Harrell’s § 974.06 motion claimed his trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142461 - 2015-05-26
indicated it did not make a difference. Harrell’s § 974.06 motion claimed his trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142461 - 2015-05-26
Kevin B. v. Michael W.E.
of counsel claim. Because this court concludes that the jury finding is supported by credible evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13220 - 2005-03-31
of counsel claim. Because this court concludes that the jury finding is supported by credible evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13220 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
postconviction motion. Pride claims that the police destroyed apparently exculpatory evidence, thereby
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33912 - 2014-09-15
postconviction motion. Pride claims that the police destroyed apparently exculpatory evidence, thereby
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33912 - 2014-09-15