Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39811 - 39820 of 69007 for had.

Eugene Stern v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
surrounding the M.A. benefits.… I mean they had a reasonable basis in argument at least, if not in fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11290 - 2005-03-31

State v. Pedro Enrique-Gaitan
, he informed Lola that her license plates had been suspended and ordered her to remove them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15682 - 2005-03-31

John P. Haselow v. Grant Gauthier
said that Gauthier was working in Hawaii while Lester testified that he had said that his son
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11842 - 2005-03-31

WI App 119 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP2076 Complete Title o...
of the land. The Wieds answered with both an affirmative defense and a counterclaim asserting they had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67352 - 2011-08-29

[PDF] WI APP 45
had a duty to report the change and purposely failed to do so within ten days of the change, and (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94555 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Rodney A. King
residing at Vladik’s residence. Earlier that day, Vladik’s boyfriend, Erik Peterson, had given King some
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15582 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Juan M. Navarro
, because Navarro had not shown that the officer’s personnel records were “within the possession, custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2417 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI APP 119
an affirmative defense and a counterclaim asserting they had acquired the land by adverse possession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67352 - 2014-09-15

State v. Roger Johnson
, to investigate a domestic-violence complaint. When they got there, Annie Johnson was very upset and had a bloody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7410 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
that the defendant had no objection was not sufficient to establish waiver of the right to be in the same courtroom
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112057 - 2014-05-13