Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39811 - 39820 of 69007 for had.
Search results 39811 - 39820 of 69007 for had.
[PDF]
Aurora Health Care Ventures, Inc. v. Touchpoint Health Plan, Inc.
in this case, Touchpoint had three shareholders: (1) United Investors; (2) Aurora; and (3) United Providers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4667 - 2017-09-19
in this case, Touchpoint had three shareholders: (1) United Investors; (2) Aurora; and (3) United Providers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4667 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Drazen Markovic
had standing to assert a violation of Article 36 of the Vienna Convention, Markovic’s trial attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18341 - 2017-09-21
had standing to assert a violation of Article 36 of the Vienna Convention, Markovic’s trial attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18341 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Bobby G. Grant
for the record that the waiver was “against [counsel’s] advice,” but advised that they had “fully discuss[ed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14340 - 2014-09-15
for the record that the waiver was “against [counsel’s] advice,” but advised that they had “fully discuss[ed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14340 - 2014-09-15
State Farm Fire & Casualty Company v. Acuity
escaping from the tank onto the Kagens’ property. The Kagens had a homeowner’s policy with State Farm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7564 - 2005-05-09
escaping from the tank onto the Kagens’ property. The Kagens had a homeowner’s policy with State Farm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7564 - 2005-05-09
State v. Drazen Markovic
as to whether an individual had standing to assert a violation of Article 36 of the Vienna Convention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18341 - 2005-05-31
as to whether an individual had standing to assert a violation of Article 36 of the Vienna Convention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18341 - 2005-05-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
up to a van that had stopped. Szabo noticed that the truck was still in the ditch with the back
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76558 - 2014-09-15
up to a van that had stopped. Szabo noticed that the truck was still in the ditch with the back
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76558 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
that if he had previously paid the surcharge, “all you have to do is write me a letter, and I will vacate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61077 - 2014-09-15
that if he had previously paid the surcharge, “all you have to do is write me a letter, and I will vacate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61077 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
affirm. I. ¶2 According to the criminal complaint, Reyes-Ortiz and the victim, S.B., who had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104781 - 2017-09-21
affirm. I. ¶2 According to the criminal complaint, Reyes-Ortiz and the victim, S.B., who had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104781 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The next day, he began kissing her and they had intercourse in his truck. About three weeks later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239918 - 2019-05-01
. The next day, he began kissing her and they had intercourse in his truck. About three weeks later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239918 - 2019-05-01
Gary L. Retzlaff v. Betty A. Winters
it determined Gary had available, for a total of $39,080. It then divided this amount in half and subtracted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13465 - 2005-03-31
it determined Gary had available, for a total of $39,080. It then divided this amount in half and subtracted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13465 - 2005-03-31