Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39811 - 39820 of 76965 for judgment for u s.
Search results 39811 - 39820 of 76965 for judgment for u s.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the discrepancy, were “violation[s]” of the manual and that, therefore, the presumption of validity is overcome
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210393 - 2018-03-29
the discrepancy, were “violation[s]” of the manual and that, therefore, the presumption of validity is overcome
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210393 - 2018-03-29
[PDF]
State v. Drazen Markovic
sentences in a postconviction motion. This court affirmed the judgment of conviction and postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18341 - 2017-09-21
sentences in a postconviction motion. This court affirmed the judgment of conviction and postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18341 - 2017-09-21
State v. Drazen Markovic
. This court affirmed the judgment of conviction and postconviction order. State v. Markovic, 1996AP2013-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18341 - 2005-05-31
. This court affirmed the judgment of conviction and postconviction order. State v. Markovic, 1996AP2013-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18341 - 2005-05-31
State v. William A.H.
County: S. MICHAEL WILK, Judge. Affirmed. SNYDER, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12891 - 2005-03-31
County: S. MICHAEL WILK, Judge. Affirmed. SNYDER, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12891 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
establishment that “tend[s] to have parties.” ¶6 The Committee chairman asked Falsetti to respond to Henry’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186269 - 2017-09-21
establishment that “tend[s] to have parties.” ¶6 The Committee chairman asked Falsetti to respond to Henry’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186269 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
’ under circumstance[s] that show utter disregard for human life.” Haizel’s express admission that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103615 - 2013-10-29
’ under circumstance[s] that show utter disregard for human life.” Haizel’s express admission that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103615 - 2013-10-29
[PDF]
State v. Larenzo M.C.
the evidence is inherently or patently incredible will [the court] substitute [its] judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6819 - 2017-09-20
the evidence is inherently or patently incredible will [the court] substitute [its] judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6819 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LEE S. DREYFUS, JR., Judge. Reversed and cause remanded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76973 - 2014-09-15
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LEE S. DREYFUS, JR., Judge. Reversed and cause remanded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76973 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable and represented his will and not his judgment; and (4) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1053789 - 2025-12-23
was arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable and represented his will and not his judgment; and (4) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1053789 - 2025-12-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable and represented its will and not its judgment; and (4) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241818 - 2019-06-12
was arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable and represented its will and not its judgment; and (4) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241818 - 2019-06-12