Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39811 - 39820 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 39811 - 39820 of 58492 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
, burglary and theft. He argues that the trial court improperly exercised its discretion when it allowed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34499 - 2008-11-03
, burglary and theft. He argues that the trial court improperly exercised its discretion when it allowed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34499 - 2008-11-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
excluded had there been a trial, a sentencing court may consider uncharged and unproven
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103691 - 2017-09-21
excluded had there been a trial, a sentencing court may consider uncharged and unproven
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103691 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Ratliff while V.V. stood next to him. The matter proceeded to trial. There, the jury heard from
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=290215 - 2020-09-23
Ratliff while V.V. stood next to him. The matter proceeded to trial. There, the jury heard from
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=290215 - 2020-09-23
[PDF]
State v. Ronald C. Renkoski
the application of the statute to undisputed facts, this court reviews the trial court’s order de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10584 - 2017-09-20
the application of the statute to undisputed facts, this court reviews the trial court’s order de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10584 - 2017-09-20
Jeffrey W. Wiseman v. Gary R. McCaughtry
sought certiorari review in the circuit court. The trial court upheld the hearing officer’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11261 - 2005-03-31
sought certiorari review in the circuit court. The trial court upheld the hearing officer’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11261 - 2005-03-31
Marathon County v. Edward F.W.
. § 51.20(1)(am) and an order denying his motion for a new trial. Edward contends the court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2623 - 2005-03-31
. § 51.20(1)(am) and an order denying his motion for a new trial. Edward contends the court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2623 - 2005-03-31
SCR CHAPTER 71
and proceedings from day to day during the progress of any trial or proceeding. (b) Unedited and typewritten
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45320 - 2011-01-02
and proceedings from day to day during the progress of any trial or proceeding. (b) Unedited and typewritten
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45320 - 2011-01-02
City of Appleton v. Jennifer L. Drephal
is reversed. ¶2 Two City of Appleton police officers testified at Drephal’s trial, lieutenant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15701 - 2005-03-31
is reversed. ¶2 Two City of Appleton police officers testified at Drephal’s trial, lieutenant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15701 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
that the presentence investigation report was inaccurate, and his trial counsel did not effectively challenge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96222 - 2013-05-07
that the presentence investigation report was inaccurate, and his trial counsel did not effectively challenge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96222 - 2013-05-07
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
is in the record, and Carter confirmed that he reviewed it with his trial counsel and understood it. The circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99721 - 2014-09-15
is in the record, and Carter confirmed that he reviewed it with his trial counsel and understood it. The circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99721 - 2014-09-15