Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39811 - 39820 of 58500 for speedy trial.
Search results 39811 - 39820 of 58500 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
excluded had there been a trial, a sentencing court may consider uncharged and unproven
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103691 - 2017-09-21
excluded had there been a trial, a sentencing court may consider uncharged and unproven
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103691 - 2017-09-21
Clarence E. Talbert v. Affiliated Carriage Systems, Inc.
employees. The trial court dismissed the action on summary judgment, and that decision is the subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2949 - 2005-03-31
employees. The trial court dismissed the action on summary judgment, and that decision is the subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2949 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
other sentence arising out of the same conduct, which occurs: 1. While the offender is awaiting trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35512 - 2009-02-09
other sentence arising out of the same conduct, which occurs: 1. While the offender is awaiting trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35512 - 2009-02-09
COURT OF APPEALS
of public trial). The United States Supreme Court has explained that cases that defy harmless error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33801 - 2008-08-20
of public trial). The United States Supreme Court has explained that cases that defy harmless error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33801 - 2008-08-20
State v. Theresa M. Sobacki
Protection Cause. The trial court decided that § 346.61 does not violate the Equal Protection Clause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16025 - 2005-03-31
Protection Cause. The trial court decided that § 346.61 does not violate the Equal Protection Clause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16025 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
arguable merit for appeal.3 We have reviewed the record including, without limitation, pre-trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=482241 - 2022-02-09
arguable merit for appeal.3 We have reviewed the record including, without limitation, pre-trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=482241 - 2022-02-09
COURT OF APPEALS
trial court record entries” and “the findings or opinion of the trial court.” Id. The appendix
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29106 - 2007-05-22
trial court record entries” and “the findings or opinion of the trial court.” Id. The appendix
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29106 - 2007-05-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not violated and that the trial court properly exercised its discretion in not granting him an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252390 - 2020-01-15
not violated and that the trial court properly exercised its discretion in not granting him an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252390 - 2020-01-15
CA Blank Order
evidence that would have been excluded had there been a trial, a sentencing court may consider uncharged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103691 - 2013-11-04
evidence that would have been excluded had there been a trial, a sentencing court may consider uncharged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103691 - 2013-11-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
existed. At sentencing, the trial court ordered a five-year term of probation and set restitution
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162458 - 2017-09-21
existed. At sentencing, the trial court ordered a five-year term of probation and set restitution
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162458 - 2017-09-21