Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39831 - 39840 of 84002 for case search.
Search results 39831 - 39840 of 84002 for case search.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2017AP1389 2 and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213397 - 2018-05-30
. No. 2017AP1389 2 and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213397 - 2018-05-30
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Pluemer
given at a recent preliminary hearing in a different criminal case against Pluemer. From
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2193 - 2017-09-19
given at a recent preliminary hearing in a different criminal case against Pluemer. From
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2193 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1118927 - 2026-05-20
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1118927 - 2026-05-20
[PDF]
Katherine G. Kane v. Scott M. Miller
of the trial court. ¶2 The facts in this case are not disputed. Kane moved for an increase in child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21204 - 2017-09-21
of the trial court. ¶2 The facts in this case are not disputed. Kane moved for an increase in child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21204 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
prevailing in this public records case. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=654106 - 2023-05-11
prevailing in this public records case. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=654106 - 2023-05-11
State v. Steven T. Miller
to Miller's sentence on revocation in an unrelated case. At the sentencing hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9136 - 2005-03-31
to Miller's sentence on revocation in an unrelated case. At the sentencing hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9136 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and the record, we conclude that this case, just shy of being frivolous, is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131631 - 2017-09-21
of the briefs and the record, we conclude that this case, just shy of being frivolous, is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131631 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
does not support the proposition for which the tenants cite it. On the contrary, in that case, our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1062513 - 2026-01-15
does not support the proposition for which the tenants cite it. On the contrary, in that case, our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1062513 - 2026-01-15
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneously denied his motion to dismiss the case on double jeopardy grounds. We disagree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35622 - 2009-02-23
erroneously denied his motion to dismiss the case on double jeopardy grounds. We disagree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35622 - 2009-02-23
COURT OF APPEALS
. See Wis. Stat. § 805.16(1). The verdict in this case was rendered in 1996, and the record contains
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34836 - 2008-12-08
. See Wis. Stat. § 805.16(1). The verdict in this case was rendered in 1996, and the record contains
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34836 - 2008-12-08