Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39831 - 39840 of 83879 for simple case search.
Search results 39831 - 39840 of 83879 for simple case search.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, C.J., Reilly and Gundrum, JJ. No. 2013AP2806 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. This case arises from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137402 - 2017-09-21
, C.J., Reilly and Gundrum, JJ. No. 2013AP2806 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. This case arises from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137402 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Kelly J. Bodoh
to investigate certain aspects of the case, the defendant must “allege with specificity what the investigation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2982 - 2017-09-19
to investigate certain aspects of the case, the defendant must “allege with specificity what the investigation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2982 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
or reopened for a new trial. Upon review, we affirm the judgment of divorce. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=679437 - 2023-07-18
or reopened for a new trial. Upon review, we affirm the judgment of divorce. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=679437 - 2023-07-18
State v. Mark W. Roob
127.03(5) applies to the undisputed facts of this case, the jury was properly instructed and Roob’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4665 - 2005-03-31
127.03(5) applies to the undisputed facts of this case, the jury was properly instructed and Roob’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4665 - 2005-03-31
State v. Randall W. Edwards
, retain, perceive and relate information differently than adults …. [A]nd this case involves a delayed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11393 - 2005-03-31
, retain, perceive and relate information differently than adults …. [A]nd this case involves a delayed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11393 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Janell R. S. v. J.R. S.
also appeals from these determinations. Because we conclude that the real controversy in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11715 - 2017-09-20
also appeals from these determinations. Because we conclude that the real controversy in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11715 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
, for various reasons. We reject Citizens’ arguments and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case involves four
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82143 - 2012-05-07
, for various reasons. We reject Citizens’ arguments and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case involves four
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82143 - 2012-05-07
WI App 68 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP901-CR Complete Titl...
2012 WI App 68 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP901-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82177 - 2012-06-26
2012 WI App 68 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP901-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82177 - 2012-06-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). In applying these standards, we “consider[] federal case law as persuasive authority … because Wisconsin’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1015531 - 2025-09-25
). In applying these standards, we “consider[] federal case law as persuasive authority … because Wisconsin’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1015531 - 2025-09-25
COURT OF APPEALS
Donaldson argues the circuit court erred by applying Northrup to this case. He asserts the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94499 - 2013-03-25
Donaldson argues the circuit court erred by applying Northrup to this case. He asserts the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94499 - 2013-03-25