Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39831 - 39840 of 83820 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 39831 - 39840 of 83820 for simple case search/1000.
State v. Damien Rudebush
cases and against the state in criminal cases, factual findings resulting from an investigation made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21708 - 2006-03-13
cases and against the state in criminal cases, factual findings resulting from an investigation made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21708 - 2006-03-13
Stephen E. Lee v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8807 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8807 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2011AP1572 Cir. Ct. No. 2010CV4434
legislation violates the Wisconsin Constitution’s marriage amendment. Specifically, this case presents
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84445 - 2014-09-15
legislation violates the Wisconsin Constitution’s marriage amendment. Specifically, this case presents
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84445 - 2014-09-15
State v. Michael J. Kidd
right to counsel was violated in two previous drunk driving cases because the record does not reflect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4986 - 2005-03-31
right to counsel was violated in two previous drunk driving cases because the record does not reflect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4986 - 2005-03-31
State v. James A. Tanksley
the police. On the facts of this case, how the allegations came to light is not relevant. It does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14797 - 2005-03-31
the police. On the facts of this case, how the allegations came to light is not relevant. It does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14797 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
answered “yes” to that question. In the context of the current case, the jury could have answered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155574 - 2017-09-21
answered “yes” to that question. In the context of the current case, the jury could have answered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155574 - 2017-09-21
Fire Insurance Exchange v. Dale M. Basten
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8419 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8419 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Muskego v. Arthur D. Dyer
reveal any bias or prejudice in the case. Id. at 717. During voir dire, potential juror D indicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4593 - 2017-09-19
reveal any bias or prejudice in the case. Id. at 717. During voir dire, potential juror D indicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4593 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
. ¶2 The parties agree that the facts of this case are undisputed as stated in the petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59061 - 2014-09-15
. ¶2 The parties agree that the facts of this case are undisputed as stated in the petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59061 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Robert L. Peterson
agreement to resolve both cases. ¶3 Under the agreement, he pled guilty to one count of misdemeanor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7178 - 2017-09-20
agreement to resolve both cases. ¶3 Under the agreement, he pled guilty to one count of misdemeanor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7178 - 2017-09-20