Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39831 - 39840 of 83837 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 39831 - 39840 of 83837 for simple case search/1000.
Lafayette County Department of Human Services v. Stephen J.C.
OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV Case Nos. 99-0546 and 00-0187 In the Interest of Bridget
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15193 - 2012-01-10
OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV Case Nos. 99-0546 and 00-0187 In the Interest of Bridget
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15193 - 2012-01-10
COURT OF APPEALS
”). Lagrone does not identify any case directly on point to support his contentions, however. Rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139119 - 2015-04-06
”). Lagrone does not identify any case directly on point to support his contentions, however. Rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139119 - 2015-04-06
State v. Joel A. DeWall
. The pertinent facts are as follows: The case against DeWall stems from a pattern of domestic abuse. Prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15041 - 2005-03-31
. The pertinent facts are as follows: The case against DeWall stems from a pattern of domestic abuse. Prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15041 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kelly J. Bodoh
counsel was deficient for failing to investigate certain aspects of the case, the defendant must “allege
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2982 - 2005-03-31
counsel was deficient for failing to investigate certain aspects of the case, the defendant must “allege
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2982 - 2005-03-31
D.C. v. Catholic Diocese of Green Bay
). The supreme court has detailed the summary judgment procedure in numerous cases. See, e.g., Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10174 - 2005-03-31
). The supreme court has detailed the summary judgment procedure in numerous cases. See, e.g., Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10174 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
GUNDRUM, J.[1] In this small claims case, Harry Wait, pro se, appeals from a judgment of the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85730 - 2012-08-07
GUNDRUM, J.[1] In this small claims case, Harry Wait, pro se, appeals from a judgment of the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85730 - 2012-08-07
COURT OF APPEALS
Tamika’s house. In its rebuttal case, the State introduced evidence of its attempts to subpoena Ronetta
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66431 - 2007-06-27
Tamika’s house. In its rebuttal case, the State introduced evidence of its attempts to subpoena Ronetta
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66431 - 2007-06-27
COURT OF APPEALS
The facts in this case are not contested. We review whether those facts meet the constitutional standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123499 - 2014-10-08
The facts in this case are not contested. We review whether those facts meet the constitutional standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123499 - 2014-10-08
State v. Michael J. Kidd
right to counsel was violated in two previous drunk driving cases because the record does not reflect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4986 - 2005-03-31
right to counsel was violated in two previous drunk driving cases because the record does not reflect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4986 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
answered “yes” to that question. In the context of the current case, the jury could have answered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155574 - 2017-09-21
answered “yes” to that question. In the context of the current case, the jury could have answered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155574 - 2017-09-21