Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39871 - 39880 of 59688 for quit claim deed/1000.

[PDF] WI 1
In May 2021, Attorney Klos filed a claim with the State’s Unclaimed Property Fund for the remaining
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1060915 - 2026-01-09

State v. Scott D. Steffes
for a refusal hearing, none had been held; and Steffes claimed that, as a result, no adverse inference should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14681 - 2005-03-31

Sharon Ferries v. Kieth M. Ferries
their guardian ad litem, filed a claim with Kieth’s estate for the $100,000 policy proceeds, and Sharon moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11807 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] The TRC Design Group, Ltd. v. Lou Perrine
of $1600. Christiansen claimed that he did the work to earn the second $1600 and that he also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12981 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Kenosha County Department of Child & Family Services v. Cornelius N.F.
now claims that the trial court did not engage in the proper colloquy regarding his no contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6376 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Kenosha County Department of Child & Family Services v. Cornelius N. F.
now claims that the trial court did not engage in the proper colloquy regarding his no contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6377 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
.3 In this motion, he claimed the police did not have probable cause to arrest him; that his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31859 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Paul E. Hawkins
was not knowingly and voluntarily made.1 He claimed that “[n]either his said trial attorney, nor the Court, nor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16066 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
court denied that motion, and Smits does not raise an ineffective assistance claim on appeal. His
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227680 - 2018-11-20

[PDF] NOTICE
claim. See Patrick Fur Farm, Inc. v. United Vaccines, Inc., 2005 WI App 190, ¶8 n.1, 286 Wis. 2d 774
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29282 - 2014-09-15