Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39881 - 39890 of 68274 for did.

State v. Troy Sanders
claims that the real controversy was not fully tried because the fact-finder did not hear White’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12724 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
197. In this case, the court considered appropriate factors, did not consider improper factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=840602 - 2024-08-21

CA Blank Order
. As to testimony recounting the victim’s out-of-court statements, Golden’s trial counsel did not file any pretrial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141576 - 2015-05-07

[PDF] NOTICE
at trial was insufficient because the State did not present any evidence that anyone actually saw him pen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28836 - 2014-09-15

Vicki L. Johnson v. Christopher T. Johnson
its decision, the trial court did not "ignore" the testimony of social workers regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10446 - 2005-03-31

State v. Calvin T. Morrison
a defendant to present an alternative defense simply because the defense offered at trial did not succeed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13240 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Charles Mc Millon v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
of not making the required rounds did not appear at the unemployment eligibility hearing. Although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8988 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] County of Buffalo v. Thomas P. Schaefer
into the northbound lane. He also testified that Schaefer did not stop to observe oncoming traffic before making
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11374 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
. The motions to reconsider and reopen alleged that Slocum did not receive a notice of the hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74946 - 2011-12-12

State v. Corey A. Keller
counties did not include the habitual criminality allegation. Keller argues that the Eau Claire County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13845 - 2005-03-31