Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39891 - 39900 of 55194 for n c.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
or both. (Footnote omitted; emphasis added.) “[C]onfinement is the ‘restraint by one person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=188272 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Frontsheet
of law could provide grounds for a traffic stop. Houghton, No. 2013AP1581-CR, at 4 n.3. The court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144444 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 182
supreme court opinion. See State v. Brandt, 226 Wis. 2d 610, 618 n.5, 594 N.W.2d 759 (1999) (“The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26343 - 2014-09-15

Frontsheet
mistake of law could provide grounds for a traffic stop. Houghton, No. 2013AP1581-CR, at 4 n.3
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144444 - 2015-07-13

[PDF] WI 73
beforehand sets a dangerous precedent. At the end of the day, "[t]he fact that a[n] [agreement] appears
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37468 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] James P. Greenwood v. Peck Foods Corporation
Wis.2d 246, 255 n.5, 381 (..continued) In Coffey v. City of Milwaukee, 74 Wis.2d 526, 247 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8064 - 2017-09-19

[PDF]
by failing to make meritless objections. See State v. Counihan, 2020 WI 12, ¶51 n.15, 390 Wis. 2d 172, 938
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846950 - 2024-09-06

Frontsheet
of the Court of Appeals. Affirmed. ¶1 N. PATRICK CROOKS, J. This is a review of an unpublished decision
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51367 - 2010-06-23

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
upset about the whole situation[.]” C. Counsel’s decision not to recall a witness to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=563027 - 2022-09-07

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is that, as stated in United States v. Vitrano, 746 F.2d 766, 770 (11th Cir. 1984), “[n]ewly discovered impeaching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213239 - 2018-07-12