Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39891 - 39900 of 58285 for speedy trial.

[PDF] 89-CV-231 v. Oneida County
boathouse and Oneida County sought to have it removed. The trial court granted judgment against Pace
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11810 - 2017-09-21

Brown County v. Rochelle D.
) and (4). ¶4 On the date scheduled for trial, Gerardo waived his right to a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3427 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Appeal No. 2009AP2907-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2006CF350
. 2 Spaeth was originally convicted in a trial by jury, but that verdict was overturned after
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58252 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
court at sentencing, and trial counsel had specifically referenced one of the reports in his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207099 - 2018-01-12

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 31, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
. The court accepted Wetter’s guilty pleas and a trial ensued on the remaining six counts. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27974 - 2007-01-30

Winnebago County v. Mark S. Lisiecki
alcohol concentration. A trial to the bench was held on November 1, 2001. Two witnesses testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4801 - 2005-03-31

Magnum Radio, Inc. v. Ronald Brieske
two radio stations in Tomah, Wisconsin. The trial court dismissed the action for failure to state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13050 - 2005-03-31

Thomas G. Nejedlo v. School District of Wausaukee
the trial court erroneously determined governmental immunity barred his claim and erroneously granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18378 - 2005-05-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
with attachments. Wilsey confirmed that he reviewed the form and attachments with his trial counsel and that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218828 - 2018-09-06

Marvin DeGrave v. Door County Cooperative
argues that if they did violate the Act, the trial court imposed an improper remedy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10918 - 2005-03-31