Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39901 - 39910 of 61719 for does.

State v. Jared J.
. (emphasis added). To construe this statutory section as Jared does would permit a juvenile offender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12836 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
a motion hearing on February 14, 2008. Paulick argued there, as she does here, that Nobile had no reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34029 - 2008-09-16

Wisconsin Court System - Circuit court forms
(JIPS) case. This does not apply to a ch. 48 child in need of protection or services. Available
/forms1/circuit/ccform.jsp?Category=&FormName=&FormNumber=&Format=&Language=es&StatuteCite=&beg_date=&end_date=&page=3

Richard Wanta v. Frederic C. Mueller
material adverse facts that the licensee knows and that the party does not know or cannot discover through
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4641 - 2013-12-16

WI App 10 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP392 Complete Title of ...
loss doctrine does not bar tort claims when the loss is to “other property.” BACKGROUND ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90366 - 2005-03-31

Brown County Department of Human Services v. Virjean L.
WI 113, ¶28, 246 Wis. 2d 67, 629 N.W.2d 698. When the trial court does not provide reasoning for its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26560 - 2006-09-25

State v. Joseph A. Diaz
. The State responds that Gallion does not govern this case because Diaz was sentenced before Gallion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20086 - 2007-06-04

State v. Isaac J.R.
of such absence by the parent or guardian of the absent pupil….” Isaac J.R. argued to the trial court, as he does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12571 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
on direct appeal.” Id. at 172. The statute, however, does not preclude a defendant from raising “an issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141618 - 2015-05-11

COURT OF APPEALS
that § 146.82 does not explicitly authorize the sealing of medical records. However, the State argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142503 - 2015-05-27