Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39911 - 39920 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 39911 - 39920 of 58506 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Jason R. Glascock
in May 1984, and was therefore eighteen at the time of trial No. 03-1561-CR 5 in August
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6581 - 2017-09-19
in May 1984, and was therefore eighteen at the time of trial No. 03-1561-CR 5 in August
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6581 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Robert Bingen v. Lisa Bzdusek
agree with the trial court’s conclusion. Therefore, we affirm. ¶2 The facts are not in dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4578 - 2017-09-19
agree with the trial court’s conclusion. Therefore, we affirm. ¶2 The facts are not in dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4578 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a reasonable doubt the elements of the charges at trial. As for the plea questionnaire form, the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86900 - 2014-09-15
a reasonable doubt the elements of the charges at trial. As for the plea questionnaire form, the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86900 - 2014-09-15
State v. David G.K.
a statement. ¶6 The trial court sentenced David to twelve years in prison on the incest count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2777 - 2005-03-31
a statement. ¶6 The trial court sentenced David to twelve years in prison on the incest count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2777 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
is “a fact or set of facts highly relevant to the imposition of sentence, but not known to the trial judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48600 - 2014-09-15
is “a fact or set of facts highly relevant to the imposition of sentence, but not known to the trial judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48600 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Christopher Butler
) THAT said advice was not in his best legal interests and that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2974 - 2017-09-19
) THAT said advice was not in his best legal interests and that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2974 - 2017-09-19
Marshfield Machine Corporation v. Bernard Martin
Machine’s business.[2] At trial, Marshfield Machine’s expert witness, Kevin Janke, testified about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2395 - 2005-03-31
Machine’s business.[2] At trial, Marshfield Machine’s expert witness, Kevin Janke, testified about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2395 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 340.01(46m)(a). ¶4 Paulick demanded a jury trial and filed a motion to suppress. The court held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34029 - 2008-09-16
. § 340.01(46m)(a). ¶4 Paulick demanded a jury trial and filed a motion to suppress. The court held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34029 - 2008-09-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and pressur[ing] him to plead no contest on a date set for trial.” The motion further claimed that Garcia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=728139 - 2023-11-14
and pressur[ing] him to plead no contest on a date set for trial.” The motion further claimed that Garcia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=728139 - 2023-11-14
[PDF]
Russell A. Jorgensen v. Dean G. Katz
of $50,500. The trial court concluded that there was no dispute of fact that the Katzes made reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8826 - 2017-09-19
of $50,500. The trial court concluded that there was no dispute of fact that the Katzes made reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8826 - 2017-09-19