Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39921 - 39930 of 76749 for i j.
Search results 39921 - 39930 of 76749 for i j.
State v. Brian P. Sullivan
(2)(i) because the court had not decided it within sixty days. Sullivan contends he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4228 - 2005-03-31
(2)(i) because the court had not decided it within sixty days. Sullivan contends he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4228 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
- benefit analysis. No. 2019AP1092-CR 5 [Spouse]: I have not met with [trial counsel]. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=365090 - 2021-05-12
- benefit analysis. No. 2019AP1092-CR 5 [Spouse]: I have not met with [trial counsel]. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=365090 - 2021-05-12
COURT OF APPEALS
. Appeal No. 2009AP1068-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2008CF1348 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50287 - 2010-05-24
. Appeal No. 2009AP1068-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2008CF1348 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50287 - 2010-05-24
State v. Kevin Jones
the following paragraphs: 2. I am cooperating with his homicide investigation with the understanding that I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14506 - 2005-03-31
the following paragraphs: 2. I am cooperating with his homicide investigation with the understanding that I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14506 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
(2011 - Court of Appeals Annual Report/Case Load Statistics)
2011 COURT OF APPEALS - CASE LOAD STATISTICS District I II
/ca/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78349 - 2014-09-15
2011 COURT OF APPEALS - CASE LOAD STATISTICS District I II
/ca/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78349 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
SC rules petition 11-05 supporting memo
and either void or replace the State Bar’s recent amendment to State Bar Bylaw Article I, Section 5 (copy
/supreme/docs/1105petitionmemo.pdf - 2011-07-14
and either void or replace the State Bar’s recent amendment to State Bar Bylaw Article I, Section 5 (copy
/supreme/docs/1105petitionmemo.pdf - 2011-07-14
State v. Tawana D. Reed
for deterrence. After explaining its sentence and the factors it considered, the sentencing court said: I feel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12096 - 2005-03-31
for deterrence. After explaining its sentence and the factors it considered, the sentencing court said: I feel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12096 - 2005-03-31
State v. Frank Penigar, Jr.
, Stats. No. 97-2058-CR STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12751 - 2005-03-31
, Stats. No. 97-2058-CR STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12751 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jason D. Schultz
that Schultz contends demonstrate a preconceived sentencing policy: I would not be inclined to recommend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8666 - 2005-03-31
that Schultz contends demonstrate a preconceived sentencing policy: I would not be inclined to recommend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8666 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
In Memoriam:
of Appeals, District I (2008 - Court of Appeals Annual Report/Case Load Statistics) 2 2008
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35593 - 2014-09-15
of Appeals, District I (2008 - Court of Appeals Annual Report/Case Load Statistics) 2 2008
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35593 - 2014-09-15