Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39921 - 39930 of 75082 for judgment for us.
Search results 39921 - 39930 of 75082 for judgment for us.
County of Winnebago v. Larry A. Schmitz
from a judgment of the circuit court for Winnebago County: BRUCE K. SCHMIDT, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3227 - 2005-03-31
from a judgment of the circuit court for Winnebago County: BRUCE K. SCHMIDT, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3227 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on appeal. Therefore, we summarily affirm the judgment of conviction. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=812118 - 2024-06-11
on appeal. Therefore, we summarily affirm the judgment of conviction. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=812118 - 2024-06-11
State v. Charles W. Dawn
of sentence and the entry of judgment were delayed until 1989, when the trial court imposed a ten-year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8855 - 2005-03-31
of sentence and the entry of judgment were delayed until 1989, when the trial court imposed a ten-year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8855 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
appeals a judgment of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion for resentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798586 - 2024-05-09
appeals a judgment of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion for resentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798586 - 2024-05-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment against him. ΒΆ9 The equal protection argument here is sorely undeveloped. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199535 - 2017-11-01
judgment against him. ΒΆ9 The equal protection argument here is sorely undeveloped. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199535 - 2017-11-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
her motions to dismiss and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict after the first trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99324 - 2014-09-15
her motions to dismiss and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict after the first trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99324 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
) Before Brown, C.J., Neubauer, P.J., and Gundrum, J. Ronald G. Sorenson appeals from a judgment imposing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102211 - 2013-09-24
) Before Brown, C.J., Neubauer, P.J., and Gundrum, J. Ronald G. Sorenson appeals from a judgment imposing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102211 - 2013-09-24
State v. Sally A. Drew
. Sally A. Drew, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from judgments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6869 - 2005-03-31
. Sally A. Drew, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from judgments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6869 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Supreme Court Statistics June 2025
are the same as those used when assessing a petition to bypass. The Supreme Court considers various factors
/sc/stats/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=985062 - 2025-07-15
are the same as those used when assessing a petition to bypass. The Supreme Court considers various factors
/sc/stats/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=985062 - 2025-07-15
[PDF]
Supreme Court Statistics June 2025
are the same as those used when assessing a petition to bypass. The Supreme Court considers various factors
/sc/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=985062 - 2025-07-15
are the same as those used when assessing a petition to bypass. The Supreme Court considers various factors
/sc/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=985062 - 2025-07-15