Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39931 - 39940 of 61720 for does.
Search results 39931 - 39940 of 61720 for does.
Artis Benninger v. State
for the property to be returned. Therefore, we affirm the circuit court’s ruling that § 968.20 does not require
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14998 - 2005-03-31
for the property to be returned. Therefore, we affirm the circuit court’s ruling that § 968.20 does not require
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14998 - 2005-03-31
State v. Charles D. Yoder
a sentence that does not fall within the sentencing guidelines." Id. It is undisputed that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8251 - 2005-03-31
a sentence that does not fall within the sentencing guidelines." Id. It is undisputed that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8251 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
written notice of appeal within 20 days of the judgment or decision.” Id. The Village does not dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147095 - 2015-08-25
written notice of appeal within 20 days of the judgment or decision.” Id. The Village does not dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147095 - 2015-08-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). This failure does not present a potentially meritorious issue for appeal, as there is no indication
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823880 - 2024-07-10
). This failure does not present a potentially meritorious issue for appeal, as there is no indication
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823880 - 2024-07-10
State v. Alfred J. Spears
Wis.2d 396, 515 N.W.2d 923 (Ct. App. 1994) (sentencing after revocation does not bring before us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13778 - 2005-03-31
Wis.2d 396, 515 N.W.2d 923 (Ct. App. 1994) (sentencing after revocation does not bring before us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13778 - 2005-03-31
Laurie Ann (Lund) Bigalke v. Ricky James Lund
annually. The stipulation recited that Bigalke intended to relocate to another state and “does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16194 - 2005-03-31
annually. The stipulation recited that Bigalke intended to relocate to another state and “does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16194 - 2005-03-31
Darnell Jackson v. Gary McCaughtry
that Jackson received is required by Wis. Adm. Code § DOC 303.81(9), which does not contain the two-day notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13674 - 2005-03-31
that Jackson received is required by Wis. Adm. Code § DOC 303.81(9), which does not contain the two-day notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13674 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Terry A. Miller v. Valarie K. Stohr
is a subsequently incurred legal obligation that does not qualify Valarie for serial payer status. See § HSS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14791 - 2017-09-21
is a subsequently incurred legal obligation that does not qualify Valarie for serial payer status. See § HSS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14791 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, 7, 563 N.W.2d 468 (1997). Our recent decision in Cherry does not qualify as a new factor. We have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53053 - 2010-08-09
, 7, 563 N.W.2d 468 (1997). Our recent decision in Cherry does not qualify as a new factor. We have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53053 - 2010-08-09
COURT OF APPEALS
omission does not provide a sufficient reason for Moore’s own failure to bring these issues to this court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133568 - 2015-01-26
omission does not provide a sufficient reason for Moore’s own failure to bring these issues to this court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133568 - 2015-01-26