Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39931 - 39940 of 58277 for speedy trial.
Search results 39931 - 39940 of 58277 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Randy L. Barreau
that the trial court erred, but now concedes that his argument must be rejected by this court because of State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16242 - 2017-09-21
that the trial court erred, but now concedes that his argument must be rejected by this court because of State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16242 - 2017-09-21
James Bruno v. Milwaukee County
with the trial court that the ordinance is not ambiguous and does not apply to the plaintiffs. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4215 - 2005-03-31
with the trial court that the ordinance is not ambiguous and does not apply to the plaintiffs. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4215 - 2005-03-31
Town of Oconto v. Michael B. Frost
on appeal, the dispositive issues are whether the trial court appropriately refused to consider some
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20499 - 2005-12-05
on appeal, the dispositive issues are whether the trial court appropriately refused to consider some
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20499 - 2005-12-05
State v. Michael J. Link
with McDowell was invalid because it violated the statute of frauds, § 402.201(1), Stats. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9289 - 2005-03-31
with McDowell was invalid because it violated the statute of frauds, § 402.201(1), Stats. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9289 - 2005-03-31
Constance R. Smith v. Philip G. Smith
586 (Ct. App. 1987). The trial court’s findings of fact regarding the “before” and “after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6901 - 2005-03-31
586 (Ct. App. 1987). The trial court’s findings of fact regarding the “before” and “after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6901 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Human Services Center v. Francis D. Bocek
. The trial court concluded that because the Center failed to prove that there was a valid commitment order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15253 - 2017-09-21
. The trial court concluded that because the Center failed to prove that there was a valid commitment order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15253 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Daniel J. Frank
that the trial court erred, but now concedes that his argument must be rejected by this court because of State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16243 - 2017-09-21
that the trial court erred, but now concedes that his argument must be rejected by this court because of State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16243 - 2017-09-21
State v. Gary E. Schumann
him of possession of THC with intent to deliver. The only issue he raises is whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6221 - 2005-03-31
him of possession of THC with intent to deliver. The only issue he raises is whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6221 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
addresses whether Padley’s trial counsel was ineffective by allowing Padley to waive the preliminary hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108207 - 2014-02-16
addresses whether Padley’s trial counsel was ineffective by allowing Padley to waive the preliminary hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108207 - 2014-02-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶2 Hicks was convicted in 2005, after a jury trial, of armed robbery with use of force, first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71890 - 2014-09-15
. ¶2 Hicks was convicted in 2005, after a jury trial, of armed robbery with use of force, first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71890 - 2014-09-15