Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39961 - 39970 of 63360 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 39961 - 39970 of 63360 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
filed a motion to dismiss Hoeller’s instant complaint, arguing that sovereign immunity, quasi-judicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=485401 - 2022-02-22
filed a motion to dismiss Hoeller’s instant complaint, arguing that sovereign immunity, quasi-judicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=485401 - 2022-02-22
State v. Rodney K. Stenseth
Stenseth appeals an amended judgment of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5974 - 2005-03-31
Stenseth appeals an amended judgment of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5974 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). The record reveals that no suppression motion was filed in this case. Potentially, Keeling could claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=595050 - 2022-12-01
). The record reveals that no suppression motion was filed in this case. Potentially, Keeling could claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=595050 - 2022-12-01
State v. Mack S.
for a period of five years. ¶4 Barry S. has filed numerous motions pursuant to Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7653 - 2005-03-31
for a period of five years. ¶4 Barry S. has filed numerous motions pursuant to Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7653 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jimmy Thomas
in violation of §§ 943.32(1) and 939.62, Stats., and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9767 - 2005-03-31
in violation of §§ 943.32(1) and 939.62, Stats., and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9767 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
loquitur instruction was warranted, and did not renew the argument in motions after verdict. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32301 - 2008-03-31
loquitur instruction was warranted, and did not renew the argument in motions after verdict. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32301 - 2008-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David W. Stokes
by a felon, and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. We affirm the trial court's refusal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7784 - 2017-09-19
by a felon, and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. We affirm the trial court's refusal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7784 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Joseph Walker, Jr. appeals, pro se, from an order denying a motion to withdraw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27473 - 2014-09-15
. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Joseph Walker, Jr. appeals, pro se, from an order denying a motion to withdraw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27473 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
City of Madison v. Vincent N. Spruill, Jr.
DYKMAN, J. 1 The City of Madison appeals from an order granting Defendant Vincent Spruill’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6810 - 2017-09-20
DYKMAN, J. 1 The City of Madison appeals from an order granting Defendant Vincent Spruill’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6810 - 2017-09-20
Vicki Lyons v. Dunn County
“made whole” doctrine. It partially based its motion on a “subrogation rights” form Kathy signed. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5607 - 2005-03-31
“made whole” doctrine. It partially based its motion on a “subrogation rights” form Kathy signed. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5607 - 2005-03-31