Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39981 - 39990 of 63360 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 39981 - 39990 of 63360 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The court granted the motion. At the outset of the resentencing hearing before a new judge, the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=314394 - 2020-12-15
. The court granted the motion. At the outset of the resentencing hearing before a new judge, the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=314394 - 2020-12-15
State v. Christopher M. Clutter
. At his postconviction motion hearing, Clutter asked the trial court to grant a new trial based on his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15261 - 2005-03-31
. At his postconviction motion hearing, Clutter asked the trial court to grant a new trial based on his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15261 - 2005-03-31
State v. Quinton K. Washington
from an order denying his postconviction motion. Washington claims that he received ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10844 - 2005-03-31
from an order denying his postconviction motion. Washington claims that he received ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10844 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion. He argues that: (1) the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction; (2) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70536 - 2014-09-15
postconviction motion. He argues that: (1) the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction; (2) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70536 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mark G. Pierquet
result in a motion to the court. Attorney Pierquet did not respond. ¶11 On May 13, 2003, opposing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20066 - 2017-09-21
result in a motion to the court. Attorney Pierquet did not respond. ¶11 On May 13, 2003, opposing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20066 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jacob J. Droessler
of the circuit court granting Jacob Droessler’s motion to suppress evidence obtained during an encounter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14313 - 2014-09-15
of the circuit court granting Jacob Droessler’s motion to suppress evidence obtained during an encounter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14313 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was tainted by the first. Following a hearing on the motion, the trial court denied the motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186561 - 2017-09-21
was tainted by the first. Following a hearing on the motion, the trial court denied the motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186561 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
In June 2006, the County filed a motion in limine asking the court to determine the appropriate measure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33787 - 2014-09-15
In June 2006, the County filed a motion in limine asking the court to determine the appropriate measure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33787 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.10(3) (2013-14). 2 All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150719 - 2017-09-21
motion. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.10(3) (2013-14). 2 All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150719 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Review-Memo
. The circuit court denied his motion, concluding that the statistical evidence did not amount to improper
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=918688 - 2025-02-19
. The circuit court denied his motion, concluding that the statistical evidence did not amount to improper
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=918688 - 2025-02-19