Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39981 - 39990 of 61910 for does.
Search results 39981 - 39990 of 61910 for does.
Winnebago County v. Kurt J. K.
does not appeal that CHIPS finding and so principles of CHIPS case law, not custody case law, apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3620 - 2011-04-28
does not appeal that CHIPS finding and so principles of CHIPS case law, not custody case law, apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3620 - 2011-04-28
[PDF]
NOTICE
.” Gallion, 270 Wis. 2d 535, ¶40. The exercise of sentencing discretion, however, “does not lend itself
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47707 - 2014-09-15
.” Gallion, 270 Wis. 2d 535, ¶40. The exercise of sentencing discretion, however, “does not lend itself
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47707 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
of the project. He claims ATCP 110.05(1)(a) does not apply to him because (1) it involves home remodeling
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140695 - 2015-04-28
of the project. He claims ATCP 110.05(1)(a) does not apply to him because (1) it involves home remodeling
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140695 - 2015-04-28
State v. John F. Draves
of a strategic reason for the failure to object does not insulate counsel’s performance from scrutiny. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10858 - 2005-03-31
of a strategic reason for the failure to object does not insulate counsel’s performance from scrutiny. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10858 - 2005-03-31
State v. John F. Draves
of a strategic reason for the failure to object does not insulate counsel’s performance from scrutiny. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10859 - 2005-03-31
of a strategic reason for the failure to object does not insulate counsel’s performance from scrutiny. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10859 - 2005-03-31
State v. James R. Boardman
forfeiture offense, could be justified on any other grounds. Nowhere in the opinion does the attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13084 - 2015-07-13
forfeiture offense, could be justified on any other grounds. Nowhere in the opinion does the attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13084 - 2015-07-13
COURT OF APPEALS
Wantland, 355 Wis. 2d 135, ¶19. The State does not argue that any of the court’s factual findings were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134923 - 2015-02-11
Wantland, 355 Wis. 2d 135, ¶19. The State does not argue that any of the court’s factual findings were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134923 - 2015-02-11
COURT OF APPEALS
factors). Massey’s current mental health status does not present an exception to the general rule because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100417 - 2013-08-05
factors). Massey’s current mental health status does not present an exception to the general rule because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100417 - 2013-08-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
] time answering the complaint.” “‘[Excusable neglect] does not include neglect which consists
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121148 - 2014-09-15
] time answering the complaint.” “‘[Excusable neglect] does not include neglect which consists
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121148 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
conduct. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 689 (1984). Counsel does not perform deficiently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=338502 - 2021-02-23
conduct. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 689 (1984). Counsel does not perform deficiently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=338502 - 2021-02-23