Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41 - 50 of 45213 for Cost-effective.
Search results 41 - 50 of 45213 for Cost-effective.
COURT OF APPEALS
of $1003.20 in costs against him on an appeal concerning a motion for sanctions. Schapiro argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64703 - 2011-06-28
of $1003.20 in costs against him on an appeal concerning a motion for sanctions. Schapiro argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64703 - 2011-06-28
[PDF]
Furnishings Unlimited, Inc. v. Department of Industry
the Petroleum Environmental Cleanup Fund (PECFA) for costs Furnishings incurred cleaning and removing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10022 - 2017-09-19
the Petroleum Environmental Cleanup Fund (PECFA) for costs Furnishings incurred cleaning and removing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10022 - 2017-09-19
Furnishings Unlimited, Inc. v. Department of Industry
denying reimbursement from the Petroleum Environmental Cleanup Fund (PECFA) for costs Furnishings incurred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10022 - 2005-03-31
denying reimbursement from the Petroleum Environmental Cleanup Fund (PECFA) for costs Furnishings incurred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10022 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Anita Gartz v. J&J Association Holding, LLC
, a late rent fee, the cost of replacing and installing a new dishwasher, and the cost of carpet cleaning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6708 - 2017-09-20
, a late rent fee, the cost of replacing and installing a new dishwasher, and the cost of carpet cleaning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6708 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
WI 113
of costs totaling $11,763.47. Of that total, $3002.95 represents appellate costs. 9 Effective July 1
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29854 - 2014-09-15
of costs totaling $11,763.47. Of that total, $3002.95 represents appellate costs. 9 Effective July 1
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29854 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of these rules shall include setback requirements that provide reasonable protection from any health effects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109502 - 2014-03-24
of these rules shall include setback requirements that provide reasonable protection from any health effects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109502 - 2014-03-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
include setback requirements that provide reasonable protection from any health effects, including
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109502 - 2017-09-21
include setback requirements that provide reasonable protection from any health effects, including
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109502 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
the Act’s minimum markup requirement and the state’s “concerns about ‘sales below cost.’” We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82285 - 2012-05-09
the Act’s minimum markup requirement and the state’s “concerns about ‘sales below cost.’” We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82285 - 2012-05-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
than defined “cost” creates “prima facie evidence” of prohibited “intent or effect to induce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82285 - 2014-09-15
than defined “cost” creates “prima facie evidence” of prohibited “intent or effect to induce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82285 - 2014-09-15
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Donald J. Harman
that the costs of these reinstatement proceedings totaling $2243.35 be paid by Harman. ¶2 In an opinion filed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17562 - 2005-03-31
that the costs of these reinstatement proceedings totaling $2243.35 be paid by Harman. ¶2 In an opinion filed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17562 - 2005-03-31