Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41 - 50 of 63677 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 41 - 50 of 63677 for Motion for joint custody.
Patricia Wathen v. Robert Moore
The parties annulled their eleven-year marriage in 1992. The judgment provided for joint legal custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2641 - 2005-03-31
The parties annulled their eleven-year marriage in 1992. The judgment provided for joint legal custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2641 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Patricia Wathen v. Robert Moore
parties’ motions and ordering joint legal custody, and basically the same physical placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2641 - 2017-09-19
parties’ motions and ordering joint legal custody, and basically the same physical placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2641 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
John McClellan v. Mary L. Santich
Santich. McClellan argues that the trial court erred in: (1) denying his motion for joint custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7910 - 2017-09-19
Santich. McClellan argues that the trial court erred in: (1) denying his motion for joint custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7910 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
John McClellan v. Mary L. Santich
Santich. McClellan argues that the trial court erred in: (1) denying his motion for joint custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8227 - 2017-09-19
Santich. McClellan argues that the trial court erred in: (1) denying his motion for joint custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8227 - 2017-09-19
John McClellan v. Mary L. Santich
motion for joint custody of his son; (2) denying his motion for modification of the placement of his son
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8138 - 2005-03-31
motion for joint custody of his son; (2) denying his motion for modification of the placement of his son
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8138 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
John McClellan v. Mary L. Santich
Santich. McClellan argues that the trial court erred in: (1) denying his motion for joint custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8138 - 2017-09-19
Santich. McClellan argues that the trial court erred in: (1) denying his motion for joint custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8138 - 2017-09-19
John McClellan v. Mary L. Santich
motion for joint custody of his son; (2) denying his motion for modification of the placement of his son
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8227 - 2005-03-31
motion for joint custody of his son; (2) denying his motion for modification of the placement of his son
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8227 - 2005-03-31
John McClellan v. Mary L. Santich
motion for joint custody of his son; (2) denying his motion for modification of the placement of his son
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7910 - 2005-03-31
motion for joint custody of his son; (2) denying his motion for modification of the placement of his son
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7910 - 2005-03-31
Andrew J.N., Jr. v. Wendy L.D.
the father's motion under § 767.325(1)(b), Stats.,[1] to transfer legal custody and primary physical placement
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8371 - 2005-03-31
the father's motion under § 767.325(1)(b), Stats.,[1] to transfer legal custody and primary physical placement
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8371 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Andrew J.N., Jr. v. Wendy L.D.
or judgment on the father's motion because mediation was not completed or terminated. MEDIATION AND JOINT
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8371 - 2017-09-19
or judgment on the father's motion because mediation was not completed or terminated. MEDIATION AND JOINT
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8371 - 2017-09-19