Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41 - 50 of 9541 for jurors.
Search results 41 - 50 of 9541 for jurors.
State v. Carlos R. Delgado
trial because one of the jurors did not disclose during the voir dire that she had been sexually
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11190 - 2005-03-31
trial because one of the jurors did not disclose during the voir dire that she had been sexually
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11190 - 2005-03-31
State v. Edron D. Broomfield
was denied his right to a fair and impartial jury because a juror, who prior to trial had overheard
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17215 - 2005-03-31
was denied his right to a fair and impartial jury because a juror, who prior to trial had overheard
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17215 - 2005-03-31
Johanna L. Manke v. Physicians Insurance Company
erred in setting aside the jury verdict against the defendants and ordering a new trial because a juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21325 - 2006-03-22
erred in setting aside the jury verdict against the defendants and ordering a new trial because a juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21325 - 2006-03-22
State v. Eric W. Raye
for postconviction relief. Raye contends the trial court erred by individually questioning a juror and then sending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7394 - 2005-03-31
for postconviction relief. Raye contends the trial court erred by individually questioning a juror and then sending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7394 - 2005-03-31
City of Muskego v. Arthur D. Dyer
that the judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered because two of the potential jurors should have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4593 - 2005-03-31
that the judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered because two of the potential jurors should have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4593 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Rules Petition 08-01
of the Committee of Chief Judges and the Chief Judge Subcommittee on Juror Treatment and Selection. The goal
/supreme/docs/0801petition.pdf - 2010-01-20
of the Committee of Chief Judges and the Chief Judge Subcommittee on Juror Treatment and Selection. The goal
/supreme/docs/0801petition.pdf - 2010-01-20
State v. Dontrell A. Leflore
, according to Leflore, did not ask follow-up questions to an allegedly biased juror, and did not move
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5300 - 2005-03-31
, according to Leflore, did not ask follow-up questions to an allegedly biased juror, and did not move
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5300 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Dontrell A. Leflore
-up questions to an allegedly biased juror, and did not move to strike the juror for cause; and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5300 - 2017-09-19
-up questions to an allegedly biased juror, and did not move to strike the juror for cause; and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5300 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Eric W. Raye
. Raye contends the trial court erred by individually questioning a juror and then sending the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7394 - 2017-09-20
. Raye contends the trial court erred by individually questioning a juror and then sending the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7394 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and equal protection of the laws were violated because during deliberations a juror saw him shackled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183419 - 2017-09-21
and equal protection of the laws were violated because during deliberations a juror saw him shackled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183419 - 2017-09-21