Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41 - 50 of 85337 for substitution of judge.
Search results 41 - 50 of 85337 for substitution of judge.
James L.J. v. Circuit Court for Walworth County
the petitioner's request for substitution of judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. ยง 801.58(1). We deny the writ and affirm
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16933 - 2005-03-31
the petitioner's request for substitution of judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. ยง 801.58(1). We deny the writ and affirm
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16933 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
James L.J. v. Circuit Court for Walworth County
the petitioner's request for substitution of judge pursuant to Wis. 1 Unless
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16933 - 2017-09-21
the petitioner's request for substitution of judge pursuant to Wis. 1 Unless
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16933 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Rochelle D.
that Rochelle had not been properly instructed of her right to substitution of judge and that she did not know
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3702 - 2017-09-19
that Rochelle had not been properly instructed of her right to substitution of judge and that she did not know
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3702 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Rochelle D.
that Rochelle had not been properly instructed of her right to substitution of judge and that she did not know
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3704 - 2017-09-19
that Rochelle had not been properly instructed of her right to substitution of judge and that she did not know
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3704 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Rochelle D.
that Rochelle had not been properly instructed of her right to substitution of judge and that she did not know
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3703 - 2017-09-19
that Rochelle had not been properly instructed of her right to substitution of judge and that she did not know
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3703 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Rochelle D.
that Rochelle had not been properly instructed of her right to substitution of judge and that she did not know
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3705 - 2017-09-19
that Rochelle had not been properly instructed of her right to substitution of judge and that she did not know
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3705 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 53
SUBSTITUTION OF TRIAL JUDGE SUBSEQUENTLY ASSIGNED. If a new judge is assigned to the trial of an action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36010 - 2014-09-15
SUBSTITUTION OF TRIAL JUDGE SUBSEQUENTLY ASSIGNED. If a new judge is assigned to the trial of an action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36010 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Covan A. Gavitt
request for substitution of judge.1 Because Gavitt did not timely request substitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10195 - 2017-09-20
request for substitution of judge.1 Because Gavitt did not timely request substitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10195 - 2017-09-20
State v. Covan A. Gavitt
an order denying his request for substitution of judge.[1] Because Gavitt did not timely request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10195 - 2005-03-31
an order denying his request for substitution of judge.[1] Because Gavitt did not timely request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10195 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
is entitled to a new trial because the trial judge failed to honor his substitution request. After reviewing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103978 - 2013-11-04
is entitled to a new trial because the trial judge failed to honor his substitution request. After reviewing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103978 - 2013-11-04