Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 401 - 410 of 9295 for jurors.

State v. Eugene Heitkemper, Sr.
) the verdict should be impeached because of prejudicial statements made by a juror during jury deliberations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8171 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Eugene Heitkemper, Sr.
should be impeached because of prejudicial statements made by a juror during jury deliberations, and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8171 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
two jurors were biased and the State made an improper closing argument. We see no error, and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106741 - 2014-01-14

Lawrence H. DeClerc v. Bellin Memorial Hospital
was a cause of Lawrence's injuries. To this question the jury answered "no," with two different jurors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14793 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Gary J. Schmidt
but before opening statements, the court learned that several jurors had seen Schmidt in ankle shackles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4611 - 2017-09-19

State v. Gary J. Schmidt
the jury was selected but before opening statements, the court learned that several jurors had seen Schmidt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4611 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Robert W. Gossar
fiancee, Crystal S., was tried to a jury selected from a panel of twenty-one jurors, which included ten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14311 - 2014-09-15

State v. Robert W. Gossar
to a jury selected from a panel of twenty-one jurors, which included ten men. During the voir dire, juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14311 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Samuel Jones
; and (3) that the trial court erred in failing to investigate possible juror misconduct. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12857 - 2017-09-21

State v. Samuel Jones
) that the trial court erred in failing to investigate possible juror misconduct. We affirm. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12857 - 2005-03-31