Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 401 - 410 of 58333 for speedy trial.
Search results 401 - 410 of 58333 for speedy trial.
State v. Jamal D. Jones
. After his preliminary hearing, Jones requested a speedy trial pursuant to § 971.10, Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9217 - 2005-03-31
. After his preliminary hearing, Jones requested a speedy trial pursuant to § 971.10, Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9217 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that there had “been no speedy trial demand.” 1 All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=640502 - 2023-04-04
that there had “been no speedy trial demand.” 1 All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=640502 - 2023-04-04
State v. John P. Krueger
the defendant's constitutional right to a speedy trial is not implicated. ¶3 The defendant asks the court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17301 - 2005-03-31
the defendant's constitutional right to a speedy trial is not implicated. ¶3 The defendant asks the court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17301 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Lane P. Caskey
) inadequately investigated the case; (8) failed to request a speedy trial; and (9) persuaded Caskey
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7285 - 2017-09-20
) inadequately investigated the case; (8) failed to request a speedy trial; and (9) persuaded Caskey
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7285 - 2017-09-20
State v. Lane P. Caskey
investigated the case; (8) failed to request a speedy trial; and (9) persuaded Caskey not to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7285 - 2005-03-31
investigated the case; (8) failed to request a speedy trial; and (9) persuaded Caskey not to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7285 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Michael J. Hager v. Gary Marten
that the only due process claim Hager may have is a right to a speedy trial. The right to a speedy trial
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17341 - 2017-09-21
that the only due process claim Hager may have is a right to a speedy trial. The right to a speedy trial
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17341 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jessie N. Pearson
was ready to proceed to trial. The trial was adjourned to a date in compliance with Pearson’s speedy trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5419 - 2005-03-31
was ready to proceed to trial. The trial was adjourned to a date in compliance with Pearson’s speedy trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5419 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
merit to a claim that Ross’s constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated. See U.S. CONST
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996563 - 2025-08-14
merit to a claim that Ross’s constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated. See U.S. CONST
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996563 - 2025-08-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
merit to a claim that Ross’s constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated. See U.S. CONST
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996563 - 2025-08-14
merit to a claim that Ross’s constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated. See U.S. CONST
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996563 - 2025-08-14
COURT OF APPEALS
in June 2009.[2] Roundtree subsequently requested a speedy trial, and jury selection began in December
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75746 - 2011-12-27
in June 2009.[2] Roundtree subsequently requested a speedy trial, and jury selection began in December
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75746 - 2011-12-27