Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4001 - 4010 of 16449 for commenting.
Search results 4001 - 4010 of 16449 for commenting.
State v. Marvin D. Clements
. And, as the State concedes, the trial court’s comment referring to the two counts—“the answer to the question does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3168 - 2005-03-31
. And, as the State concedes, the trial court’s comment referring to the two counts—“the answer to the question does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3168 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael Ray Juber
comment at sentencing that this case has “been a prison case since day one” shows the court had decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5032 - 2005-03-31
comment at sentencing that this case has “been a prison case since day one” shows the court had decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5032 - 2005-03-31
Allen J. Pronschinske v. Rupinder Singh, M.D.
remark the appellants objected to was counsel’s comment that Dr. Singh did not care about Karen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4261 - 2005-03-31
remark the appellants objected to was counsel’s comment that Dr. Singh did not care about Karen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4261 - 2005-03-31
State v. Lee Crouthers
reasons. He argues that the trial court’s comments that his offense was serious because it involved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15534 - 2005-03-31
reasons. He argues that the trial court’s comments that his offense was serious because it involved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15534 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Rick Pease, Jr.
comment. First, Pease also argues that the State’s appeal is premature because the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18320 - 2017-09-21
comment. First, Pease also argues that the State’s appeal is premature because the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18320 - 2017-09-21
Kevin B. v. Michael W.E.
terminating parental rights if the trial court’s comments demonstrate that it was convinced the parent’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13220 - 2005-03-31
terminating parental rights if the trial court’s comments demonstrate that it was convinced the parent’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13220 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that the Supreme Court’s comments were dicta, because the question of the appropriate burden of proof
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93170 - 2013-02-20
that the Supreme Court’s comments were dicta, because the question of the appropriate burden of proof
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93170 - 2013-02-20
[PDF]
State v. Tony M. Smith
for you.” Later, when Knott advised Smith that she was going to report his conduct, Smith commented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14043 - 2014-09-15
for you.” Later, when Knott advised Smith that she was going to report his conduct, Smith commented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14043 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. John R. Holsonback
to the retailer’s employees, prefacing her comment by stating, “in reading the factual basis.” The court, before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26005 - 2017-09-21
to the retailer’s employees, prefacing her comment by stating, “in reading the factual basis.” The court, before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26005 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Allen J. Pronschinske v. Rupinder Singh, M.D.
objected to was counsel’s comment that Dr. Singh did not care about Karen. The trial court No. 01
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4261 - 2017-09-19
objected to was counsel’s comment that Dr. Singh did not care about Karen. The trial court No. 01
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4261 - 2017-09-19