Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4001 - 4010 of 50083 for writ of certiorari forms.
Search results 4001 - 4010 of 50083 for writ of certiorari forms.
Richard N. Nickl v. John Husz
to 1999. On certiorari review, the circuit court concluded that the Commission had not given proper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13139 - 2005-03-31
to 1999. On certiorari review, the circuit court concluded that the Commission had not given proper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13139 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Edward Pryzina v. City of Thorp
Pryzina’s lot, and required the Browns to avoid any damage to Pryzina’s tree. On certiorari review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10079 - 2017-09-19
Pryzina’s lot, and required the Browns to avoid any damage to Pryzina’s tree. On certiorari review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10079 - 2017-09-19
State v. Outagamie County Board of Adjustment
On our initial certiorari review, we reversed the circuit court’s order and remanded with directions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6306 - 2005-03-31
On our initial certiorari review, we reversed the circuit court’s order and remanded with directions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6306 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Cle A. Gray, Jr. v. Donald Gudmanson
Standard of Review. Judicial review in certiorari actions is limited to determining whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11574 - 2017-09-19
Standard of Review. Judicial review in certiorari actions is limited to determining whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11574 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Robert M. Pace v. Oneida County
. No(s). 99-2133 3 applications to rebuild the boathouse. The Paces did not commence a certiorari
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15875 - 2017-09-21
. No(s). 99-2133 3 applications to rebuild the boathouse. The Paces did not commence a certiorari
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15875 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Richard N. Nickl v. John Husz
. On certiorari review, the circuit court concluded that the Commission had not given proper consideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13139 - 2017-09-21
. On certiorari review, the circuit court concluded that the Commission had not given proper consideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13139 - 2017-09-21
Cle A. Gray, Jr. v. Donald Gudmanson
. DISCUSSION Standard of Review. Judicial review in certiorari actions is limited to determining whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11574 - 2005-03-31
. DISCUSSION Standard of Review. Judicial review in certiorari actions is limited to determining whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11574 - 2005-03-31
Lake Bluff Housing Partners v. City of South Milwaukee
, 1994, the trial court issued a writ of mandamus directing South Milwaukee’s building inspector to issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2831 - 2005-03-31
, 1994, the trial court issued a writ of mandamus directing South Milwaukee’s building inspector to issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2831 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 5
for summary judgment on his writ of mandamus and ordering the District to release a parent e-mail list
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=597823 - 2023-02-14
for summary judgment on his writ of mandamus and ordering the District to release a parent e-mail list
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=597823 - 2023-02-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Enders’s1 motion to quash Palm’s petition for a writ of mandamus. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1014859 - 2025-09-30
Enders’s1 motion to quash Palm’s petition for a writ of mandamus. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1014859 - 2025-09-30