Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40021 - 40030 of 73043 for petition.

Vern Cramer v. Marinette County
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See Wis. Stat. § 808.10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5268 - 2005-03-31

State v. Wandell Lee
will appear in the bound volume of the Official Reports. A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26213 - 2006-08-14

State v. Robert A. Lohmeier
a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See Wis. Stat. § 808.10 and Rule 809.62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2166 - 2005-03-31

State v. Andrew C. Polhamus
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See § 808.10 and Rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14196 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See WIS. STAT. § 808.10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51717 - 2014-09-15

State v. Avery T., Jr.
NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8594 - 2005-03-31

State v. Timothy T. Morgan
NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8565 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. George F. Appleyard
file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2756 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67959 - 2014-09-15

Ammann and Whitney, Inc. v. Thomas Roskos
NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7945 - 2005-03-31