Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40051 - 40060 of 63771 for Motion for joint custody.

Predco, Inc v. First Bank Southeast, N.A.
" of $55,805.58.[2] After paying the judgment against it, Predco filed a motion in the LTV
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8459 - 2005-03-31

State v. Ibrahim Begicevic
, he filed motions seeking to suppress all blood alcohol test results, all oral and written statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6454 - 2005-03-31

State v. Carlos Rene Delgado
that denied his motion under Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2003-04)[1] for a new trial. He asserted in his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7000 - 2005-03-31

George Simpson v. Title Industry Assurance Company
); denying Cherryland's cross-motion for summary judgment; and dismissing Cherryland's cross-claim against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14147 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence found by the police during a warrantless search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=998345 - 2025-08-20

[PDF] Virgil F. Gustafson v. Physicians Insurance Company of Wisconsin, Inc.
Accordingly, the Gustafsons will not be bringing any motions after the verdict on their own behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13469 - 2017-09-21

CA Blank Order
. These are: whether the trial court erred in denying Rainer’s motion to suppress an out-of-court identification
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120833 - 2014-08-28

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
intoxicated (“OWI”), as a second offense. Jenkins argues the circuit court erred by denying her motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=488629 - 2022-03-01

State v. Samuel Arthur Brown
Brown appeals from an order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (1997-98)[1] motion. Brown claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16039 - 2005-03-31

State v. Eric W. Raye
for a mistrial on the ground that the verdict was not unanimous. The circuit court denied the motion, indicating
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18434 - 2005-06-06