Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40051 - 40060 of 58492 for speedy trial.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Because we conclude the motion was procedurally barred, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104696 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Ernesto Zuniga
Zuniga. ¶3 The trial court initially found that the officers in Texas and Brown County lacked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4516 - 2017-09-19

State v. Michael J. Link
with McDowell was invalid because it violated the statute of frauds, § 402.201(1), Stats. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9289 - 2005-03-31

City of Marinette v. Paul H. Gerondale
challenges the trial court's denial of his motion to suppress evidence on grounds of an illegal search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11105 - 2005-03-31

Bruce Baldwin Mohs v. State of Wisconsin Department of Transportation
to § 32.10, Stats. The trial court ruled on summary judgment that there was no taking by the Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7890 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and his trial counsel’s assistance at sentencing. We affirm the circuit court. ¶2 Four days after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82051 - 2014-09-15

State v. Nathan J. Pettigrew
motion for a new trial. This was Pettigrew’s fifth motion for postconviction relief. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20106 - 2007-06-04

[PDF] State v. Michael J. Link
of frauds, § 402.201(1), STATS. The trial court denied his motion, concluding that the statute of frauds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9289 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Green Bay Packaging, Inc. v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
Packaging, Inc, together with its worker's compensation insurer, appeals a trial court order that affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10573 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Human Services Center v. Francis D. Bocek
. The trial court concluded that because the Center failed to prove that there was a valid commitment order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15253 - 2017-09-21