Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40061 - 40070 of 62133 for child support.
Search results 40061 - 40070 of 62133 for child support.
David J. Peterson v. Pennsylvania Life Insurance Company
review the court’s decision as a factual one, the record does not support a finding that he is qualified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5117 - 2005-03-31
review the court’s decision as a factual one, the record does not support a finding that he is qualified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5117 - 2005-03-31
State v. Henry T. Skibinski
admitted that he had one prior OWI conviction. Thus, the record supports the fact that the August 10th OWI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2592 - 2005-03-31
admitted that he had one prior OWI conviction. Thus, the record supports the fact that the August 10th OWI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2592 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Andrew M. Obriecht
and noting that no evidence had been offered in support of his other plea withdrawal theories. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15669 - 2017-09-21
and noting that no evidence had been offered in support of his other plea withdrawal theories. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15669 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Graeme J. Paxton v. Vulcan Basement Waterproofing Company of Wisconsin, Inc.
, not supported by sufficient evidence and limited by contract. We affirm the judgment. ¶2 To rectify water
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15379 - 2017-09-21
, not supported by sufficient evidence and limited by contract. We affirm the judgment. ¶2 To rectify water
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15379 - 2017-09-21
State v. William L. Brockett
to communicate a plea offer which Brockett would have accepted had he known about it.[2] In support of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3960 - 2005-03-31
to communicate a plea offer which Brockett would have accepted had he known about it.[2] In support of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3960 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael S. Kazanjian
to charge an offense known to law. Instead, he alleges that the facts do not support a conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15484 - 2017-09-21
to charge an offense known to law. Instead, he alleges that the facts do not support a conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15484 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. William A. Rouse
. No. 01-0774-CR 3 that the restitution order “was not supported by any evidence in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3752 - 2017-09-19
. No. 01-0774-CR 3 that the restitution order “was not supported by any evidence in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3752 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Carlos D. Hope
identification, claiming that the photo array was obtained from an “improper warrantless arrest not supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16174 - 2017-09-21
identification, claiming that the photo array was obtained from an “improper warrantless arrest not supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16174 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Gary M. Kruckenberg
. 2 The record also supports the trial court's conclusion that Schenk was not qualified to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9338 - 2017-09-19
. 2 The record also supports the trial court's conclusion that Schenk was not qualified to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9338 - 2017-09-19
State v. William N. Ledford
In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a criminal conviction, we do not substitute our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2402 - 2005-03-31
In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a criminal conviction, we do not substitute our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2402 - 2005-03-31