Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40071 - 40080 of 82877 for case codes/1000.
Search results 40071 - 40080 of 82877 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1) (2021-22).2 We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=834135 - 2024-08-06
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1) (2021-22).2 We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=834135 - 2024-08-06
Donald Rumage v. Robert M. Gullberg
. This is a judgment lien foreclosure case. The issue is whether a properly docketed judgment in favor of Donald
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11421 - 2005-03-31
. This is a judgment lien foreclosure case. The issue is whether a properly docketed judgment in favor of Donald
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11421 - 2005-03-31
Kenneth M. Neiman v. David L. Larson
to this court’s order dated May 21, 1997, this case was submitted to the court on the expedited appeals calendar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12073 - 2005-03-31
to this court’s order dated May 21, 1997, this case was submitted to the court on the expedited appeals calendar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12073 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Darrell C. Solfest
, the issue presented by this case is one of statutory construction. As such, a de novo standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12201 - 2017-09-21
, the issue presented by this case is one of statutory construction. As such, a de novo standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12201 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
enhancement in the pending case. Bucknell alleged that he had not validly waived his Sixth Amendment[2] right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54975 - 2010-09-29
enhancement in the pending case. Bucknell alleged that he had not validly waived his Sixth Amendment[2] right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54975 - 2010-09-29
[PDF]
NOTICE
. We remanded the case to the circuit court for further proceedings. In that order, we stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39320 - 2014-09-15
. We remanded the case to the circuit court for further proceedings. In that order, we stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39320 - 2014-09-15
Richard G. Jankowski v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company
in this case precluding summary judgment disposition. We disagree. First, the facts concerning Jankowski’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13071 - 2005-03-31
in this case precluding summary judgment disposition. We disagree. First, the facts concerning Jankowski’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13071 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of the defendant.” Echols, 175 Wis. 2d at 673. In this case, Cole testified that Gonzalez did not give him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57655 - 2010-12-13
of the defendant.” Echols, 175 Wis. 2d at 673. In this case, Cole testified that Gonzalez did not give him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57655 - 2010-12-13
[PDF]
Manitowoc County Department of Social Services v. Shannon T.
, 1998. We remanded this case to the circuit court on September 14, 1998, and it was resubmitted to us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14321 - 2014-09-15
, 1998. We remanded this case to the circuit court on September 14, 1998, and it was resubmitted to us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14321 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 263
2006 WI APP 263 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2006AP283
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27272 - 2014-09-15
2006 WI APP 263 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2006AP283
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27272 - 2014-09-15