Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40081 - 40090 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 40081 - 40090 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
State v. James C. Stigney
at .207%. ¶3 Stigney filed with the trial court a motion to suppress the blood test results
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16161 - 2005-03-31
at .207%. ¶3 Stigney filed with the trial court a motion to suppress the blood test results
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16161 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the motion. This court denied the motion to dismiss but directed the parties to address mootness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=802696 - 2024-05-23
the motion. This court denied the motion to dismiss but directed the parties to address mootness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=802696 - 2024-05-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.30(2)(h). A no-merit appeal is appropriate only if counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=928651 - 2025-03-13
motion under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.30(2)(h). A no-merit appeal is appropriate only if counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=928651 - 2025-03-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.30(2)(h). A no-merit appeal is appropriate only if counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=928651 - 2025-03-13
motion under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.30(2)(h). A no-merit appeal is appropriate only if counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=928651 - 2025-03-13
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
a postconviction motion. Because a no-merit report is only appropriate if counsel is convinced that an appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99604 - 2014-09-15
a postconviction motion. Because a no-merit report is only appropriate if counsel is convinced that an appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99604 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
April 25, 2012, denying his latest motion for sentence modification. After reviewing the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94331 - 2014-09-15
April 25, 2012, denying his latest motion for sentence modification. After reviewing the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94331 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion challenging the multiple surcharges. IT IS ORDERED that the no-merit report is stricken
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162586 - 2017-09-21
motion challenging the multiple surcharges. IT IS ORDERED that the no-merit report is stricken
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162586 - 2017-09-21
State v. Teranika H.
.” The defense objected, but the court granted the State’s motion and adjudicated Teranika delinquent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2654 - 2005-03-31
.” The defense objected, but the court granted the State’s motion and adjudicated Teranika delinquent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2654 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a postconviction motion; (2) inform us by letter that Johnson did not wish to pursue the identified issues; or (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996791 - 2025-08-12
a postconviction motion; (2) inform us by letter that Johnson did not wish to pursue the identified issues; or (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996791 - 2025-08-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and Blanchard, JJ. Paul Zarter appeals an order denying his postconviction motion filed under WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177087 - 2017-09-21
, and Blanchard, JJ. Paul Zarter appeals an order denying his postconviction motion filed under WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177087 - 2017-09-21