Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40081 - 40090 of 59146 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 40081 - 40090 of 59146 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
Faye V. Monicken v. John M. Monicken
to dismiss Faye's contempt motion, claiming that in January 1993, the parties had orally modified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14621 - 2017-09-21
to dismiss Faye's contempt motion, claiming that in January 1993, the parties had orally modified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14621 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Donald A. Thompson v. Lacrosse County Board of Adjustment
resolution nunc pro tunc November 1, 1993. The Thompsons claim that the original decision of the Board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8062 - 2017-09-19
resolution nunc pro tunc November 1, 1993. The Thompsons claim that the original decision of the Board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8062 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Joseph C. Frey
not claimed that the hairs would have exonerated him. Therefore, their exculpatory value was only potential
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8721 - 2017-09-19
not claimed that the hairs would have exonerated him. Therefore, their exculpatory value was only potential
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8721 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an evidentiary hearing on his ineffective assistance of counsel claim or, alternatively, to grant his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=767596 - 2024-02-22
an evidentiary hearing on his ineffective assistance of counsel claim or, alternatively, to grant his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=767596 - 2024-02-22
[PDF]
State v. Perry C. Love
an order denying his motion to modify his sentence. Love raises three claims of error: (1) the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14423 - 2014-09-15
an order denying his motion to modify his sentence. Love raises three claims of error: (1) the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14423 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
David S. Ide v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
compensation claim.3 At the hearing before the administrative law judge (ALJ), Ide’s supervisor, who
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17274 - 2017-09-21
compensation claim.3 At the hearing before the administrative law judge (ALJ), Ide’s supervisor, who
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17274 - 2017-09-21
State v. Andre S. Fuller
. He claimed that he was confused during the sentencing hearing “because the court asked more than one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24831 - 2006-04-17
. He claimed that he was confused during the sentencing hearing “because the court asked more than one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24831 - 2006-04-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Christopher. Id. at 692. ¶11 On appeal, Franklin again claimed, as we phrased it, that the term “left
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=851737 - 2024-09-18
Christopher. Id. at 692. ¶11 On appeal, Franklin again claimed, as we phrased it, that the term “left
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=851737 - 2024-09-18
[PDF]
Patricia K. Bernhardt v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
, for unemployment compensation benefits. DILHR denied Bernhardt’s claim on October 21, 1993. Then on October
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10149 - 2017-09-19
, for unemployment compensation benefits. DILHR denied Bernhardt’s claim on October 21, 1993. Then on October
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10149 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for a hearing on December 21, 2010. In addressing the competing claims, the commissioner observed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101997 - 2017-09-21
for a hearing on December 21, 2010. In addressing the competing claims, the commissioner observed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101997 - 2017-09-21