Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4011 - 4020 of 20877 for word.

State v. Herbert Ascher
, in the writer’s word, “passed” the lie detector test, calling the lie-detector results “[o]ne of the most
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2263 - 2005-03-31

State v. Sarah R.P.
, dictionary definitions may be consulted to establish the common and approved usage of words. See Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2890 - 2005-03-31

Michael P. Norks v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
of the insured would have understood the words to mean. Garriguenc v. Love, 67 Wis.2d 130, 134-35, 226 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8929 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 152
violation. As the court noted in Renz, the legislature used the word “preliminary” for a specific
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33961 - 2014-09-15

State v. Kelly K. Koopmans
the State's argument that we should construe the word “shall” in § 971.04(1), Stats., as directory rather than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9086 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Brown County Department of Health & Human Services v. Tammy L.W.
. This conclusion follows from the wording of sec. 48.427(2), Stats., that the evidence “does not warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3591 - 2017-09-19

State v. Kelly K. Koopmans
the State's argument that we should construe the word “shall” in § 971.04(1), Stats., as directory rather than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8317 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Sarah R.P.
to establish the common and approved usage of words. See WIS. STAT. § 990.010(1); see also Swatek v. County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2890 - 2017-09-19

Peter Joncas v. Erie Manufacturing Co.
testified that certain “information” should have been provided to users, instead of using the specific word
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7002 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
to sheriff’s sale, but rather only mandates a redemption period. In other words, the statutes presume
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100036 - 2013-07-29