Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40101 - 40110 of 82603 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.

[PDF] County of Shawano v. Judith K. Minniecheske
- The subjective prong of the test was met when Judge Schmidt indicated that he was able to proceed impartially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9171 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] City of Sheboygan v. Dale R. Mlejnek
acted reasonably in detaining a person, we apply an objective test which considers whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14975 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
constitutes reasonable suspicion is a common sense test: under all the facts and circumstances present, what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57606 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
suspicion is a common sense test: under all the facts and circumstances present, what would a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58159 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Supreme Court of Wisconsin
and comply with the law. Under that rule, the test for the appearance of impropriety is whether
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146878 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
investigation, the appropriate test is whether the officer had probable cause to believe that the law had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123385 - 2014-10-07

[PDF] State v. Floyd Worth
is not licensed to practice law in Wisconsin, and never has been. The test for harmless error "whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11046 - 2017-09-19

Supreme Court of Wisconsin Judicial Conduct Advisory Committee Date Issued: August 18, 2015 ...
. Included under that rule is an obligation to respect and comply with the law. Under that rule, the test
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146878 - 2015-08-18

State v. Gerald D. O'Brien
are not persuaded. The test is not whether the HTO revocation could not have been imposed but for a failure to pay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15317 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
reasonable suspicion is a common sense test: under all the facts and circumstances present, what would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57606 - 2010-12-08