Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40121 - 40130 of 50521 for our.
Search results 40121 - 40130 of 50521 for our.
[PDF]
Frontsheet
misconduct. From our independent review of the matter, we agree that a 60-day suspension of Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168758 - 2017-09-21
misconduct. From our independent review of the matter, we agree that a 60-day suspension of Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168758 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
assistance of counsel. ¶17 Finally, we exercise our discretionary power to grant a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=346600 - 2021-03-17
assistance of counsel. ¶17 Finally, we exercise our discretionary power to grant a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=346600 - 2021-03-17
COURT OF APPEALS
’ sample was that the THC test had to be run twice, but that even this was “not outside our normal scope
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145573 - 2015-08-04
’ sample was that the THC test had to be run twice, but that even this was “not outside our normal scope
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145573 - 2015-08-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for sentence modification. Based on our review of the briefs and records, we conclude at conference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1089761 - 2026-03-12
for sentence modification. Based on our review of the briefs and records, we conclude at conference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1089761 - 2026-03-12
COURT OF APPEALS
an erroneous exercise of discretion. See Hartung v. Hartung, 102 Wis. 2d 58, 66, 306 N.W.2d 16 (1981) (our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113094 - 2014-05-27
an erroneous exercise of discretion. See Hartung v. Hartung, 102 Wis. 2d 58, 66, 306 N.W.2d 16 (1981) (our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113094 - 2014-05-27
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 8, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
. The court further explained: “Our conclusions do not render a parent’s incarceration irrelevant. We simply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28063 - 2007-02-07
. The court further explained: “Our conclusions do not render a parent’s incarceration irrelevant. We simply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28063 - 2007-02-07
COURT OF APPEALS
, when our supreme court replaced “abuse of discretion” with “erroneous exercise of discretion.” See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55486 - 2010-10-12
, when our supreme court replaced “abuse of discretion” with “erroneous exercise of discretion.” See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55486 - 2010-10-12
COURT OF APPEALS
the basis for our affirmance of the trial court’s order. As found by the trial court, the officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32983 - 2008-06-10
the basis for our affirmance of the trial court’s order. As found by the trial court, the officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32983 - 2008-06-10
COURT OF APPEALS
, 202 Wis. 2d 620, 645, 551 N.W.2d 50 (Ct. App. 1996). ¶17 Our review of the sentencing record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109735 - 2014-04-01
, 202 Wis. 2d 620, 645, 551 N.W.2d 50 (Ct. App. 1996). ¶17 Our review of the sentencing record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109735 - 2014-04-01
[PDF]
NOTICE
the influence of an intoxicant. ¶8 Our review of a circuit court’s findings of fact is deferential. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41618 - 2014-09-15
the influence of an intoxicant. ¶8 Our review of a circuit court’s findings of fact is deferential. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41618 - 2014-09-15