Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40121 - 40130 of 58546 for speedy trial.
Search results 40121 - 40130 of 58546 for speedy trial.
State v. Gary E. Schumann
him of possession of THC with intent to deliver. The only issue he raises is whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6221 - 2005-03-31
him of possession of THC with intent to deliver. The only issue he raises is whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6221 - 2005-03-31
State v. Patrick A. Decorah
on the motion, the trial court concluded that Kraetke lacked reasonable suspicion to stop Decorah and dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5089 - 2005-03-31
on the motion, the trial court concluded that Kraetke lacked reasonable suspicion to stop Decorah and dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5089 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Constance R. Smith v. Philip G. Smith
). The trial court’s findings of fact regarding the “before” and “after” circumstances and whether a change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6901 - 2017-09-20
). The trial court’s findings of fact regarding the “before” and “after” circumstances and whether a change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6901 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Richard S. Dammon
trial counsel was ineffective regarding alleged inaccuracies in the presentence investigation (PSI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26282 - 2017-09-21
trial counsel was ineffective regarding alleged inaccuracies in the presentence investigation (PSI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26282 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
James Kirk Jacobson v. The Town of Stone Lake
is a valid public highway. The trial court truncated evidence on whether the strip of land was properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3119 - 2017-09-20
is a valid public highway. The trial court truncated evidence on whether the strip of land was properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3119 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
PER CURIAM. Nathan Pettigrew appeals from the order denying his motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20106 - 2014-09-15
PER CURIAM. Nathan Pettigrew appeals from the order denying his motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20106 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶2 Hicks was convicted in 2005, after a jury trial, of armed robbery with use of force, first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71890 - 2014-09-15
. ¶2 Hicks was convicted in 2005, after a jury trial, of armed robbery with use of force, first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71890 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is entitled to a new trial. Id. at 102. ¶3 In this case, the parties agreed on the jury instructions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265330 - 2020-07-28
is entitled to a new trial. Id. at 102. ¶3 In this case, the parties agreed on the jury instructions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265330 - 2020-07-28
State v. Nathan J. Pettigrew
motion for a new trial. This was Pettigrew’s fifth motion for postconviction relief. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20106 - 2007-06-04
motion for a new trial. This was Pettigrew’s fifth motion for postconviction relief. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20106 - 2007-06-04
Constance R. Smith v. Philip G. Smith
586 (Ct. App. 1987). The trial court’s findings of fact regarding the “before” and “after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6901 - 2005-03-31
586 (Ct. App. 1987). The trial court’s findings of fact regarding the “before” and “after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6901 - 2005-03-31