Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40121 - 40130 of 64843 for timed.

State v. Brian J. Leiteritz
. At the time of the accident in August 2001, Leiteritz was driving a 1987 car which he had purchased just a few
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6055 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
Progressive’s bad faith continued through that time. He does not, however, develop this argument or cite any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45687 - 2010-01-11

State v. Bradley G. Genrich
was between .24 and .27% at the time of the shooting. The toxicologist testified that as with any person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24519 - 2006-03-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
not accept Eplett’s notice-of-claim argument because Eplett is raising that argument for the first time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913864 - 2025-02-13

Village of Lake Delton v. James A. Roberts
with the zoning code in effect at the time the deck was built, and therefore affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4613 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was clear. These safeguards “assure accuracy and trustworthiness” when more time has elapsed than under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=988725 - 2025-07-30

Gregory C. Royal v. Sara Seehafer
and exposed himself to her. Royal’s version of the story was that after talking to Seehafer for some time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3203 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the time reasonably required” to issue a ticket for the original offense. Illinois v. Caballes, 543 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965317 - 2025-06-04

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
ordinarily does not address arguments raised for the first time in a reply brief). Discussion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145303 - 2017-09-21

City of Whitewater v. Robert P. Michor
practice in some instances, most of the time the credibility call is self-evident and needs no elucidation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4683 - 2005-03-31