Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40131 - 40140 of 76682 for i j.
Search results 40131 - 40140 of 76682 for i j.
COURT OF APPEALS
. This is on-going and has happened on several occasions. I have felt so threatened by his actions that I have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145364 - 2015-07-30
. This is on-going and has happened on several occasions. I have felt so threatened by his actions that I have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145364 - 2015-07-30
COURT OF APPEALS
stated: I need to protect the public. I have to ask myself, are you a good risk. And I have to answer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85719 - 2012-08-06
stated: I need to protect the public. I have to ask myself, are you a good risk. And I have to answer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85719 - 2012-08-06
COURT OF APPEALS
OF APPEALS DISTRICT I State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70792 - 2011-09-12
OF APPEALS DISTRICT I State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70792 - 2011-09-12
COURT OF APPEALS
. Appeal No. 2011AP1537-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2010CF987 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82117 - 2012-05-07
. Appeal No. 2011AP1537-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2010CF987 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82117 - 2012-05-07
COURT OF APPEALS
OF APPEALS DISTRICT I State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60274 - 2011-02-22
OF APPEALS DISTRICT I State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60274 - 2011-02-22
State v. Robert Lintz
as follows: I’m going to try to explain [this] as best that I can. Under Section 906.08(2), Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13122 - 2005-03-31
as follows: I’m going to try to explain [this] as best that I can. Under Section 906.08(2), Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13122 - 2005-03-31
City of Eau Claire v. Christopher A. Jerram
he’s charged with, Your Honor. THE COURT: I understand, sir, but I also have to use a little common
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20984 - 2006-01-17
he’s charged with, Your Honor. THE COURT: I understand, sir, but I also have to use a little common
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20984 - 2006-01-17
[PDF]
City of Eau Claire v. Christopher A. Jerram
Honor. THE COURT: I understand, sir, but I also have to use a little common sense, and I’m sorry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20984 - 2017-09-21
Honor. THE COURT: I understand, sir, but I also have to use a little common sense, and I’m sorry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20984 - 2017-09-21
State v. Deshawn Rodgers
properly exercised its sentencing discretion, we affirm. I. BACKGROUND On July 9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9683 - 2005-03-31
properly exercised its sentencing discretion, we affirm. I. BACKGROUND On July 9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9683 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Deshawn Rodgers
the trial court properly exercised its sentencing discretion, we affirm. I. BACKGROUND On July 9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9683 - 2017-09-19
the trial court properly exercised its sentencing discretion, we affirm. I. BACKGROUND On July 9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9683 - 2017-09-19