Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40131 - 40140 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 40131 - 40140 of 58492 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s order, entered after a bench trial, dismissing Aaron’s claims and Nicole’s third-party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789172 - 2024-04-16
court’s order, entered after a bench trial, dismissing Aaron’s claims and Nicole’s third-party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789172 - 2024-04-16
[PDF]
Frontsheet
charges were dismissed but read in. As a result, Fugere would waive his right to trial regarding guilt
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238262 - 2019-05-30
charges were dismissed but read in. As a result, Fugere would waive his right to trial regarding guilt
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238262 - 2019-05-30
[PDF]
WI APP 109
and remand for a new trial. ¶3 Because the correct burden of proof for the showing required by 25 U.S.C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36995 - 2014-09-15
and remand for a new trial. ¶3 Because the correct burden of proof for the showing required by 25 U.S.C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36995 - 2014-09-15
2009 WI APP 109
witness” within the meaning of § 1912(f). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for a new trial. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36995 - 2009-07-06
witness” within the meaning of § 1912(f). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for a new trial. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36995 - 2009-07-06
State v. Bill P. Marquardt
determined that Marquardt was competent to stand trial, it concluded that he was not competent to proceed pro
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20396 - 2005-11-22
determined that Marquardt was competent to stand trial, it concluded that he was not competent to proceed pro
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20396 - 2005-11-22
[PDF]
State v. Bill P. Marquardt
Court had determined that Marquardt was competent to stand trial, it concluded that he
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20396 - 2017-09-21
Court had determined that Marquardt was competent to stand trial, it concluded that he
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20396 - 2017-09-21
State v. Charles J. Hajicek
that applying a deferential standard of review to a trial court's ultimate determination of probable cause
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17462 - 2005-03-31
that applying a deferential standard of review to a trial court's ultimate determination of probable cause
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17462 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
, Thomas R. Wolfgram, Judge. ¶2 Defendant Jonathan J. Hubbard (Hubbard) was convicted in a jury trial
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33408 - 2008-07-14
, Thomas R. Wolfgram, Judge. ¶2 Defendant Jonathan J. Hubbard (Hubbard) was convicted in a jury trial
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33408 - 2008-07-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the evidence presented at his jury trial was insufficient to support his convictions because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=607580 - 2023-01-05
that the evidence presented at his jury trial was insufficient to support his convictions because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=607580 - 2023-01-05
[PDF]
State v. Charles J. Hajicek
to a trial court's ultimate determination of probable cause or reasonable suspicion would lead to "varied
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17462 - 2017-09-21
to a trial court's ultimate determination of probable cause or reasonable suspicion would lead to "varied
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17462 - 2017-09-21