Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40171 - 40180 of 66174 for e j.
Search results 40171 - 40180 of 66174 for e j.
COURT OF APPEALS
Donald L. Shine, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Michael O. Sertich and Maureen E. Sertich
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65160 - 2011-05-31
Donald L. Shine, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Michael O. Sertich and Maureen E. Sertich
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65160 - 2011-05-31
[PDF]
State v. Suzette M. Ward
was submitted on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney general, and James M. Freimuth, assistant attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14446 - 2017-09-21
was submitted on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney general, and James M. Freimuth, assistant attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14446 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Ruven Seibert
was submitted on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney general, and Warren D. Weinstein, assistant attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12970 - 2017-09-21
was submitted on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney general, and Warren D. Weinstein, assistant attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12970 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
,” and “[w]e will not disturb the circuit court’s decision to admit evidence unless the court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=725520 - 2023-11-08
,” and “[w]e will not disturb the circuit court’s decision to admit evidence unless the court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=725520 - 2023-11-08
Rule Order
that occurred in the 2009-10 term, a case, Ehlinger, was held for 8.5 months after it was circulated. E-L
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82165 - 2012-05-03
that occurred in the 2009-10 term, a case, Ehlinger, was held for 8.5 months after it was circulated. E-L
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82165 - 2012-05-03
Gloria A. v. State
of the appellant's brief. (e) Cases appealed under this section shall be given preference and shall be taken
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8590 - 2005-03-31
of the appellant's brief. (e) Cases appealed under this section shall be given preference and shall be taken
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8590 - 2005-03-31
Nathan Gillis v. Gary McCaughtry
from an order of the circuit court for Dodge County: joseph e. schultz, Judge. Affirmed in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13957 - 2005-03-31
from an order of the circuit court for Dodge County: joseph e. schultz, Judge. Affirmed in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13957 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of a Class B felony.” WIS. STAT. § 948.02(1)(e) (2009-10). The definitions of “sexual contact” require
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80608 - 2014-09-15
of a Class B felony.” WIS. STAT. § 948.02(1)(e) (2009-10). The definitions of “sexual contact” require
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80608 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court for Polk County: MOLLY E. GALEWYRICK, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded for further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93964 - 2014-09-15
court for Polk County: MOLLY E. GALEWYRICK, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded for further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93964 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to be persuasive or even plausible. Id., ¶31. “[E]ven a ‘silly or superstitious’ reason, if facially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69079 - 2014-09-15
to be persuasive or even plausible. Id., ¶31. “[E]ven a ‘silly or superstitious’ reason, if facially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69079 - 2014-09-15