Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40181 - 40190 of 57152 for id.
Search results 40181 - 40190 of 57152 for id.
James D. Luedtke v. Daniel Bertrand
of mandamus. Id. at 287-88, 387 N.W.2d at 120. We did so in this case and ordered a response
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13233 - 2005-03-31
of mandamus. Id. at 287-88, 387 N.W.2d at 120. We did so in this case and ordered a response
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13233 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. This court upholds the circuit court’s findings of historical fact unless those are clearly erroneous. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243907 - 2019-07-18
. This court upholds the circuit court’s findings of historical fact unless those are clearly erroneous. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243907 - 2019-07-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
that counsel’s performance was deficient. Id.; State v. McDowell, 2004 WI 70, ¶49, 272 Wis. 2d 488, 681 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39257 - 2014-09-15
that counsel’s performance was deficient. Id.; State v. McDowell, 2004 WI 70, ¶49, 272 Wis. 2d 488, 681 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39257 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Donald R. Binsfeld v. Donald S. Conrad
neither control nor custody of the appurtenant area. Id. at 642. Conversely, the owner of appurtenant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6405 - 2017-09-19
neither control nor custody of the appurtenant area. Id. at 642. Conversely, the owner of appurtenant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6405 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
unfairness to either party. Id. at 815. Here, there was no explanation of how a reduced amount of child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=903882 - 2025-01-22
unfairness to either party. Id. at 815. Here, there was no explanation of how a reduced amount of child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=903882 - 2025-01-22
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 7, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
that discretion was in fact exercised and a reasonable basis exists for the decision. Id. ¶7 Debbie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28330 - 2007-03-06
that discretion was in fact exercised and a reasonable basis exists for the decision. Id. ¶7 Debbie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28330 - 2007-03-06
State v. Nicholas A.G.
). If the trial court has done this, we affirm the decision even if it is not one we ourselves would reach. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12589 - 2005-03-31
). If the trial court has done this, we affirm the decision even if it is not one we ourselves would reach. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12589 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
may grant a new trial without finding the probability of a different result on retrial. Id. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90808 - 2012-12-17
may grant a new trial without finding the probability of a different result on retrial. Id. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90808 - 2012-12-17
COURT OF APPEALS
are undisputed and only a question of law remains.” Id. We similarly independently review a circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125300 - 2014-10-28
are undisputed and only a question of law remains.” Id. We similarly independently review a circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125300 - 2014-10-28
State v. Jacob M.W.
possesses a rational as well as factual understanding of a proceeding against him or her.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7574 - 2005-03-31
possesses a rational as well as factual understanding of a proceeding against him or her.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7574 - 2005-03-31