Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40191 - 40200 of 63760 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 40191 - 40200 of 63760 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). No. 2024AP2538-CR 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Following the circuit court’s denial of his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1045069 - 2025-12-03
). No. 2024AP2538-CR 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Following the circuit court’s denial of his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1045069 - 2025-12-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a motion hearing, the circuit court granted the defendants’ motions to dismiss the first amended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990788 - 2025-07-31
a motion hearing, the circuit court granted the defendants’ motions to dismiss the first amended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990788 - 2025-07-31
COURT OF APPEALS
a postconviction motion more than sixteen months after his conviction seeking a new trial on the basis that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131736 - 2014-12-17
a postconviction motion more than sixteen months after his conviction seeking a new trial on the basis that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131736 - 2014-12-17
[PDF]
State v. Christopher M. Clutter
years in prison with sixteen years of concurrent probation. At his postconviction motion hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15261 - 2017-09-21
years in prison with sixteen years of concurrent probation. At his postconviction motion hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15261 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
North Central Companies, Inc. v. D & D Properties
the judgment. Because we grant D & D’s motion for reasonable attorney fees, we remand for a determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2806 - 2017-09-19
the judgment. Because we grant D & D’s motion for reasonable attorney fees, we remand for a determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2806 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and extend the time for counsel to file a postconviction motion. A jury found Krupp guilty of possession
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220386 - 2018-10-02
, and extend the time for counsel to file a postconviction motion. A jury found Krupp guilty of possession
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220386 - 2018-10-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
January 1, 2012. ¶4 The City filed a summary judgment motion. In its motion, the City argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115439 - 2017-09-21
January 1, 2012. ¶4 The City filed a summary judgment motion. In its motion, the City argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115439 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
granted the motion to dismiss the private nuisance claim because Stroede’s conduct did not amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143087 - 2015-06-16
granted the motion to dismiss the private nuisance claim because Stroede’s conduct did not amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143087 - 2015-06-16
County of Rock v. Robert D. Haylock
ordinance adopting § 346.63(1)(b). He seeks review of an order denying his motions to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9294 - 2005-03-31
ordinance adopting § 346.63(1)(b). He seeks review of an order denying his motions to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9294 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) (2009–10).1 Garrett argues that the trial court erroneously denied his motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72614 - 2014-09-15
) (2009–10).1 Garrett argues that the trial court erroneously denied his motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72614 - 2014-09-15