Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40191 - 40200 of 63981 for records/1000.

Elizabeth H. Taylor v. James A. Taylor
for bringing a frivolous motion. James contends that the court's finding is not supported by the record. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9911 - 2005-03-31

Dunn County v. Peggy R.
be individualized with regard to [Peggy] within the next six months so that we can have a record that’s presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7311 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] *This opinion was circulated and approved before Judge Wedemeyer's death.
verdict. Because it was stipulated that Camacho had a felony conviction, and the Record contains ample
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33522 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
: specifically, that “[t]here is no evidence in this record that Yerks was aware of what Buchanan planned to do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155722 - 2017-09-21

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Robert T. Malloy
and commingling for his own funds with them, failing to keep required trust account records, failing to respond
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16515 - 2005-03-31

Barbara Ellis v. City of Reedsburg
in his investigation. Ellis asks that we listen to the tape recording of her telephone conversation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8099 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI 109
of the Illinois disciplinary records are deemed admitted. ¶6 Those Illinois disciplinary documents indicate
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87991 - 2014-09-15

John Hinz v. Christopher Leet
in this record to support a verdict and finding of permission either express or implied. There is clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8408 - 2012-03-29

COURT OF APPEALS
its sentencing discretion. Id. at 5–6. After an independent review of the record and consideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30037 - 2007-08-20

State v. Izell W.
assault was not made part of the record until his post-adjudication motion, there is no dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7028 - 2008-04-20