Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40191 - 40200 of 58500 for speedy trial.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
” was necessary. At the outset of the trial, the parties addressed the fact that previous termination orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=851534 - 2024-09-17

State v. Larry J. Kain
)(a) as a third-time offender. Kain pled no contest to the charge following the trial court’s denial of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6579 - 2005-03-31

Patricia A. Charette v. State
. The Labor and Industry Review Commission (LIRC) appeals from a judgment of the trial court wherein the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8353 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
of the apartment building, the jury selection, and the effectiveness of his trial counsel. This court affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38434 - 2009-07-27

CA Blank Order
, but not known to the trial judge at the time of original sentencing, either because it was not then in existence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111763 - 2014-05-01

Rickly Wesley v. The City of Milwaukee
is entitled to immunity from suit pursuant to § 893.80(4), Stats. Wesley claims the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11700 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Tayr Kilaab al Ghashiyah (Khan) v. Prudential Insurance Company of America
) appeals pro se from an order of the trial court dismissing Kilaab's claims. We conclude that Kilaab's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8567 - 2017-09-19

Mary Messer v. Lynn T. Martin, M.D.
to determine whether there are any material facts in dispute that entitle the opposing party to a trial. Frost
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7268 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Fox City Scale, Inc. v. Badger Scale, Inc.
that they did not have a duty to defend or indemnify their insureds. The trial court agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12126 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Frankie Wardell Simmons
a trial court’s ultimate ruling even though its reasoning was incorrect.” State v. Heimermann, 205
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4038 - 2017-09-20