Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40201 - 40210 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 40201 - 40210 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
filed a postconviction motion alleging that the State withheld exculpatory information about Lee’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39043 - 2009-08-05
filed a postconviction motion alleging that the State withheld exculpatory information about Lee’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39043 - 2009-08-05
[PDF]
Review-Memo
. The circuit court denied his motion, concluding that the statistical evidence did not amount to improper
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=918688 - 2025-02-19
. The circuit court denied his motion, concluding that the statistical evidence did not amount to improper
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=918688 - 2025-02-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-appointed doctors did not find dangerousness, so the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149117 - 2017-09-21
-appointed doctors did not find dangerousness, so the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149117 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 22, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
Lukas appeals from judgments of conviction and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28530 - 2007-03-21
Lukas appeals from judgments of conviction and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28530 - 2007-03-21
Eller Media, Inc v. State of Wisconsin Division of Hearings and Appeals
. On June 23, 2000, the DHA granted the DOT’s motion for summary judgment and affirmed the removal order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3434 - 2005-03-31
. On June 23, 2000, the DHA granted the DOT’s motion for summary judgment and affirmed the removal order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3434 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). Jose M. Henriquez appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion to vacate restitution
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=267886 - 2020-07-08
). Jose M. Henriquez appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion to vacate restitution
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=267886 - 2020-07-08
State v. Floyd Hopkins
. § 943.20(1)(a), and from the trial court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20004 - 2005-10-24
. § 943.20(1)(a), and from the trial court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20004 - 2005-10-24
City of Sheboygan v. Korry L. Ardell
orders denying his motion to reopen four default judgments entered against him for operating after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26068 - 2006-08-01
orders denying his motion to reopen four default judgments entered against him for operating after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26068 - 2006-08-01
State v. Mack S.
for a period of five years. ¶4 Barry S. has filed numerous motions pursuant to Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7653 - 2005-03-31
for a period of five years. ¶4 Barry S. has filed numerous motions pursuant to Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7653 - 2005-03-31
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mark G. Pierquet
that failure to respond would result in a motion to the court. Attorney Pierquet did not respond. ¶11
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20066 - 2005-10-24
that failure to respond would result in a motion to the court. Attorney Pierquet did not respond. ¶11
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20066 - 2005-10-24